Categories as paradigms for comparative cognition

Forming categories is a basic cognitive operation allowing animals to attain concepts, i.e. to represent various classes of objects, natural or artificial, physical or social. Categories can also be formed about the relations holding among these objects, notably similarity and identity. Some of the cognitive processes involved in categorisation will be enumerated. Also, special reference will be made to a much neglected area of research, that of social representations. Here, animals conceive the natural class of their conspecifics as well as the relationships established between them in groups. Two types of social categories were mentioned: (1) intraspecies recognition including recognition of individual conspecifics; and (2) representation of dominance hierarchies and of their transitivity in linear orders.

[1]  F. Trillmich.  Learning Experiments on Individual Recognition in Budgerigars (Melopsittacusundulatus) , 1976, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.

[2]  Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus) , 1993, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  J. Beaugrand,et al.  Coherent use of information by hens observing their former dominant defeating or being defeated by a stranger , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[4]  Gary L. Bradshaw,et al.  Generalization of Visual Matching by a Bottlenosed Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Evidence for Invariance of Cognitive Performance with Visual and Auditory Materials , 1989 .

[5]  H. Roitblat,et al.  Comparative cognition: representations and processes in learning and memory. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  H. M. Hanson.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  R. Zayan.  Mental representations in the recognition of conspecific individuals , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[8]  M. Bunge.  Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[9]  Roger K. R. Thompson,et al.  A profound disparity revisited: Perception and judgment of abstract identity relations by chimpanzees, human infants, and monkeys , 1995, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  I. Chase,et al.  DYNAMICS OF HIERARCHY FORMATION: THE SEQUENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS , 1982 .

[11]  D. Rumbaugh,et al.  Reference: the linguistic essential. , 1980, Science.

[12]  R. K. Thompson,et al.  Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  T R Zentall,et al.  Pigeons can learn identity or difference, or both. , 1976, Science.

[14]  R. Gardner,et al.  A vocabulary test for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1984, Journal of comparative psychology.

[15]  M. R. D'Amato,et al.  The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1988 .

[16]  S. Lea,et al.  Discrimination of Polymorphous Stimulus Sets by Pigeons , 1978 .

[17]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  M. Dawkins.  Distance and Social Recognition in Hens: Implications for the Use of Photographs as Social Stimuli , 1996 .

[19]  J. Vauclair,et al.  Categorization of alphanumeric characters by Guinea baboons : within- and between-class stimulus discrimination , 1996 .

[20]  H. Roitblat,et al.  Comparative approaches to cognitive science , 1995 .

[21]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Discrimination of Individuals in Pigeons , 1990 .

[22]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  R. Cook,et al.  Same-different texture discrimination and concept learning by pigeons. , 1995 .

[24]  I. DENNIS,et al.  New Problem in Concept Formation , 1973, Nature.

[25]  M. Jitsumori.  Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning. , 1993 .

[26]  D. Premack,et al.  Infant chimpanzees spontaneously perceive both concrete and abstract same/different relations. , 1990, Child development.

[27]  W. Roberts,et al.  Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. , 1988 .

[28]  R. Lemon,et al.  Comparative Social Recognition, Patrick Colgan. John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex (1983), xiv, +281. Price £35.75 , 1984 .

[29]  Catriona M. E. Ryan,et al.  Unnatural Concepts and the Theory of Concept Discrimination in Birds , 2019, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior.

[30]  M. Povar,et al.  Studies of concept formation by stumptailed monkeys: Concepts humans, monkeys, and letter A.. , 1984 .

[31]  A. Wright,et al.  Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) learn category matching in a nonidentical same-different task. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  S. Lea,et al.  Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[33]  Shigeru Watanabe.  Effect of lesions in the ectostriatum and Wulst on species and individual discrimination in pigeons , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  Stephen E G Lea,et al.  Pigeons Learn the Concept of an ‘A’ , 1976, Perception.

[35]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Ian P. L. McLaren,et al.  Prototype effects and peak shift in categorization. , 1995 .

[37]  M Jitsumori,et al.  Discrimination of Artificial Polymorphous Categories by Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[39]  Joël Fagot,et al.  Categorisation of three-dimensional stimuli by humans and baboons: search for prototype effects , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[40]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[41]  Juan D Delius,et al.  Transitive responding in animals and humans: Exaptation rather than adaptation? , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[42]  Catriona M. E. Ryan,et al.  Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[43]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. , 1988 .

[44]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Spatial list learning in black-capped chickadees , 1994 .

[45]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Failure of visual prototype learning in the pigeon , 1988 .

[47]  V. Dasser,et al.  A social concept in Java monkeys , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  D. Premack,et al.  Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[49]  D. G. Lander,et al.  The pigeon’s concept of pigeon , 1971 .

[50]  Jacques Vauclair.  Animal Cognition: An Introduction to Modern Comparative Psychology , 1996 .

[51]  Donald J. Tyrrell,et al.  Perception of abstract identity/difference relationships by infants , 1991 .

[52]  Juan D. Delius,et al.  Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons , 1992 .

[53]  J. Pearce,et al.  Prototype Effects in Categorization by Pigeons , 1994 .

[54]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[55]  Russell P. Balda,et al.  Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 1985 .

[56]  Catriona M. E. Ryan,et al.  Discrimination of Five-Dimensional Stimuli by Pigeons: Limitations of Feature Analysis , 1993 .

[57]  J. Cerella.  Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  A Test of the Linear Feature Model of Polymorphous Concept Discrimination with Pigeons , 1993 .

[59]  R. J. Herrnstein,et al.  Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach , 1990, Cognition.