Modelling the loss and retention of contacts in social networks: The role of dyad-level heterogeneity and tie strength

Social networks have attracted attention in different fields of research in recent years and choice modellers have engaged with their analysis by looking at the role that social networks play in shaping decisions across a variety of contexts. The incorporation of the social dimension in choice models creates the need for understanding how social networks evolve over time and in particular which social contacts (alters) are retained over time by an individual (ego). Existing work fails to capture the full extent of ego-level and ego-alter level heterogeneity in these processes. We propose the use of a hybrid model framework which is based on the notion of latent strength of relationship. The resulting model allows for heterogeneity in the latent strength both across individuals and across their different relationships. In addition, we allow for heterogeneity not linked to the latent strength concept. We demonstrate the benefits of the approach using data from Chile, showing the presence of extensive variations in retention of social contacts and in strength of relationship both at the ego and ego-alter level, only some of which can be linked to observed characteristics.

[1]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[2]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[3]  J. Halton.  On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals , 1960 .

[4]  B. Wellman,et al.  How Far and with Whom Do People Socialize? , 2008 .

[5]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[6]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Decision uncertainty in multi-attribute stated preference studies , 2016 .

[7]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[8]  A. Páez,et al.  Social Influence on Travel Behavior: A Simulation Example of the Decision to Telecommute , 2007 .

[9]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Does the social context help with understanding and predicting the choice of activity type and duration? An application of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Nested Extreme Value model to activity diary data , 2017 .

[10]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful , 2016 .

[11]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Recovery of inter- and intra-personal heterogeneity using mixed logit models , 2011 .

[12]  J. Carrasco,et al.  Social activity-travel dynamics with core contacts: evidence from a two-wave personal network data , 2018 .

[13]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[14]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  An analysis of the dynamics of activity and travel needs in response to social network evolution and life-cycle events: A structural equation model , 2014 .

[15]  Cristian Angelo Guevara,et al.  A Monte Carlo experiment to analyze the curse of dimensionality in estimating random coefficients models with a full variance-covariance matrix , 2012 .

[16]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[17]  Barry Wellman,et al.  A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities☆ , 1997 .

[18]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Dynamic Network Logistic Regression: A Logistic Choice Analysis of Inter- and Intra-Group Blog Citation Dynamics in the 2004 US Presidential Election , 2013, Political Analysis.

[19]  John M. Rose,et al.  Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated on repeated choice data , 2009 .

[20]  Matthias Kowald,et al.  Modelling contact mode and frequency of interactions with social network members using the multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model , 2017 .

[21]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[22]  Alain Degenne,et al.  The dynamics of personal networks at the time of entry into adult life , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[23]  Eric J Miller,et al.  Collecting Social Network Data to Study Social Activity-Travel Behavior: An Egocentric Approach , 2008 .

[24]  Ali Haider,et al.  Partner naming and forgetting: Recall of network members , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Predicting the evolution of social networks with life cycle events , 2015, Transportation.

[26]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Correcting for endogeneity in behavioral choice models with social influence variables , 2011 .

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Martin Weißmann,et al.  Kapferer (1969): Norms and the Manipulation of Relationships in a Work Context , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[29]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Modeling joint evacuation decisions in social networks: The case of Hurricane Sandy , 2017 .

[30]  C. Cirillo,et al.  Generalized behavioral framework for choice models of social influence: Behavioral and data concerns in travel behavior , 2015 .

[31]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[32]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social and Spatial Network Interdependencies , 2005 .

[33]  Juan Antonio Carrasco,et al.  Network Capital, Social Networks, and Travel: An Empirical Illustration from Concepción, Chile , 2012 .

[34]  Lesley Chiou,et al.  Masking Identification of Discrete Choice Models Under Simulation Methods , 2007 .

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  E. Xing,et al.  Discrete Temporal Models of Social Networks , 2006, SNA@ICML.

[37]  G. Simmel.  The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[38]  Beate Völker,et al.  Changes in personal relationships: How social contexts affect the emergence and discontinuation of relationships , 2014, Soc. Networks.