Three‐dimensional brittle fracture: configurational‐force‐driven crack propagation

SUMMARY This paper presents a computational framework for quasi-static brittle fracture in three-dimensional solids. The paper sets out the theoretical basis for determining the initiation and direction of propagating cracks based on the concept of configurational mechanics, consistent with Griffith's theory. Resolution of the propagating crack by the FEM is achieved by restricting cracks to element faces and adapting the mesh to align it with the predicted crack direction. A local mesh improvement procedure is developed to maximise mesh quality in order to improve both accuracy and solution robustness and to remove the influence of the initial mesh on the direction of propagating cracks. An arc-length control technique is derived to enable the dissipative load path to be traced. A hierarchical hp-refinement strategy is implemented in order to improve both the approximation of displacements and crack geometry. The performance of this modelling approach is demonstrated on two numerical examples that qualitatively illustrate its ability to predict complex crack paths. All problems are three-dimensional, including a torsion problem that results in the accurate prediction of a doubly-curved crack. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ercan Gürses,et al.  A computational framework of configurational-force-driven brittle fracture based on incremental energy minimization , 2007 .

[2]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Modeling 3D crack propagation in unreinforced concrete using PUFEM , 2005 .

[3]  Garth N. Wells,et al.  Discontinuous modelling of strain localisation and failure , 2001 .

[4]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  An ALE formulation based on spatial and material settings of continuum mechanics. Part 1: Generic hyperelastic formulation , 2004 .

[5]  S. Bordas,et al.  A robust preconditioning technique for the extended finite element method , 2011 .

[6]  Chris J. Pearce,et al.  Numerical multiscale solution strategy for fracturing heterogeneous materials , 2010 .

[7]  Z. P. Bažant,et al.  Size effect on structural strength: a review , 1999 .

[8]  Timothy J. Tautges,et al.  MOAB : a mesh-oriented database. , 2004 .

[9]  P. Steinmann,et al.  On a solution strategy for energy-based mesh optimization in finite hyperelastostatics , 2008 .

[10]  Chris J. Pearce,et al.  A corotational hybrid-Trefftz stress formulation for modelling cohesive cracks , 2009 .

[11]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Analysis of three‐dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method , 2005 .

[12]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods , 2010 .

[13]  J. Oliver.  MODELLING STRONG DISCONTINUITIES IN SOLID MECHANICS VIA STRAIN SOFTENING CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS. PART 1: FUNDAMENTALS , 1996 .

[14]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Element‐local level set method for three‐dimensional dynamic crack growth , 2009 .

[15]  J. Shewchuk.  What Is a Good Linear Finite Element? Interpolation, Conditioning, Anisotropy, and Quality Measures , 2002 .

[16]  Heinrich Müller,et al.  A Scheme for Edge-based Adaptive Tetrahedron Subdivision , 1997, VisMath.

[17]  George Karypis,et al.  Functional genomics of nectar production in the Brassicaceae , 2012 .

[18]  Ercan Gürses,et al.  A computational framework of three-dimensional configurational-force-driven brittle crack propagation , 2009 .

[19]  Mark Ainsworth,et al.  Hierarchic finite element bases on unstructured tetrahedral meshes , 2003 .

[20]  Walter Noll,et al.  The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity , 1963 .

[21]  Kenji Shimada,et al.  An Angle-Based Approach to Two-Dimensional Mesh Smoothing , 2000, IMR.

[22]  Mohaddeseh Mousavi Nezhad,et al.  A Modelling Framework for Three-Dimensional Brittle Fracture , 2012 .

[23]  Anthony Duncan Jefferson,et al.  Three dimensional finite element simulations of fracture tests using the craft concrete model , 2004 .