Considerations for the design of networked exertion interactions

Research in human?computer interaction has begun to acknowledge the benefits of physicality in the way people interact with computers. Mostly, the role of physicality is often understood in terms of the characteristics of tangible computationally augmented objects, but here we are stressing that the physicality lies also within the interaction, not just the object. We use a subset of bodily actions, exertion interactions, as an example to demonstrate our point. Emerging designs, particularly within a game context, have shown that supporting such exertion interactions can enable beneficial experiences between geographically distant participants. We have reflected on several designs (from our own work as well as other's) in this area to identify practical considerations for the design of systems that aim to support and facilitate bodily aspects of physicality in networked environments. We hope our insights can serve as guiding tool for designers who are interested in creating future systems that support networked exertion interactions.

[1]  John Kremer,et al.  Psychology In Sport , 1994 .

[2]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction , 2006, CHI.

[3]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[4]  James A. Landay,et al.  Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity , 2006, CHI.

[5]  BONNIE A. NARDI,et al.  Beyond Bandwidth: Dimensions of Connection in Interpersonal Communication , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  People, Places, and Play: A research framework for digital game experience in a socio-spatial context , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[7]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Sports over a Distance , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[8]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  A physical three-way interactive game based on table tennis , 2007, IE '07.

[9]  Devina Ramduny-Ellis,et al.  Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Physicality, Physicality 2007 , 2007 .

[10]  Terry L. Maple,et al.  Touching Behavior in Sport: Functional Components, Analysis of Sex Differences, and Ethological Considerations , 2001 .

[11]  Florian Mueller,et al.  Jogging the distance , 2007, CHI.

[12]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Evaluating a distributed physical leisure game for three players , 2007, OZCHI '07.

[13]  Jenny Edwards,et al.  Understanding Movement as Input for Interaction-a study of Two EyeToy(tm) Games , 2004 .

[14]  Steve Benford,et al.  Designing the spectator experience , 2005, CHI.

[15]  Ying-Chieh Liu,et al.  A Framework to Evaluate the Performance and Satisfaction of Virtual Teams in On-line Learning Environment , 2006 .

[16]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward , 2004, DIS '04.

[17]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  PingPongPlus: design of an athletic-tangible interface for computer-supported cooperative play , 1999, CHI '99.

[18]  Hiroshi Ishii Tangible bits: designing the seamless interface between people, bits, and atoms , 2003, IUI '03.

[19]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Chapter 11 Putting it all together: Requirements for a CSCW platform , 1996 .

[20]  Donald R. Glover,et al.  Team Building Through Physical Challenges , 1992 .

[21]  A Crozier,et al.  Evaluation of physical exertion required to play the body movement controlled Eyetoy Kinetic video game , 2007 .

[22]  Florian Mueller,et al.  Airhockey over a distance: a networked physical game to support social interactions , 2006, ACE '06.

[23]  Stefan Agamanolis,et al.  Exertion interfaces: sports over a distance for social bonding and fun , 2003, CHI '03.

[24]  Alex Thorogood,et al.  Jogging over a distance , 2007, CHI 2007.

[25]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[26]  Frank Vetere,et al.  Design experiences with networked exertion games , 2007 .

[27]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers , 2002, CHI.