Update Policy of Dense Maps: Efficient Algorithms and Sparse Representation

Providing a robot with a fully detailed map is one appealing key for the Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping (SLAM) problem. It gives the robot a lot of hints to solve either the data association or the localisation problem itself. The more details are in the map, the more chances are that different places may appear differently, solving ambiguities. The more landmarks are used, the more accurate are the algorithms that solve the localisation problem since in a least square sense an approximation of the solution is more precise. Last, it helps a lot in the presence of a few dynamic objects because these moving parts of the environment remain marginal in the amount of data used to model the map and can thus be filtered out. For instance, the moving objects can be detected or cancelled in the localisation procedure by robust techniques using Monte-Carlo algorithms [6] or RANSAC [4].

[1]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[2]  Jurgen Vandorpe,et al.  Exact dynamic map building for a mobile robot using geometrical primitives produced by a 2D range finder , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents) , 2005 .

[4]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Wavelet Occupancy Grids: A Method for Compact Map Building , 2005, FSR.

[5]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Dense Mapping for Range Sensors: Efficient Algorithms and Sparse Representations , 2007, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[6]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Probabilistic octree modeling of a 3D dynamic environment , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Multi-Level Surface Maps for Outdoor Terrain Mapping and Loop Closing , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Gerhard K. Kraetzschmar,et al.  Probabilistic quadtrees for variable-resolution mapping of large environments , 2004 .

[9]  Alberto Elfes,et al.  Occupancy grids: a probabilistic framework for robot perception and navigation , 1989 .

[10]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  MCMC Data Association and Sparse Factorization Updating for Real Time Multitarget Tracking with Merged and Multiple Measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Paul Newman,et al.  Using laser range data for 3D SLAM in outdoor environments , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[12]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Range data merging for probabilistic octree modeling of 3D workspaces , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[13]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Improving Grid-based SLAM with Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters by Adaptive Proposals and Selective Resampling , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Peter Biber,et al.  The normal distributions transform: a new approach to laser scan matching , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).