Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? 1 This paper has su

Abstract With the exception of financial firms, we find no evidence that comprehensive income is more strongly associated with returns/market value or better predicts future cash flows/income than net income. Moreover, the only component of comprehensive income that improves the association between income and returns is the marketable securities adjustment. Our results do not support the claim that comprehensive income is a better measure of firm performance than net income. Our results also raise questions about the appropriateness of items included in SFAS 130 comprehensive income as well as the need for mandating uniform comprehensive income disclosures for all industries.

[1]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  Price and return models , 1995 .

[2]  E. Ofek,et al.  Investor Valuation of the Abandonment Option , 1995 .

[3]  Paul Zarowin,et al.  Permanent versus transitory components of annual earnings and estimation error in earnings response coefficients , 1992 .

[4]  Ilia D. Dichev,et al.  Earnings, Adaptation, and Equity Value , 1996 .

[5]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  The Relation Between Earnings and Cash Flows , 1998 .

[6]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Fair value accounting: Effects on banks' earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows , 1995 .

[7]  S. Kothari Price-earnings regressions in the presence of prices leading earnings: Earnings level versus change specifications and alternative deflators , 1992 .

[8]  K. Ramesh,et al.  Fair value disclosures by bank holding companies , 1996 .

[9]  Paul Munter Reporting comprehensive income , 1996 .

[10]  K. Peasnell,et al.  Clean surplus : a link between accounting and finance , 1996 .

[11]  John O'Hanlon,et al.  The value relevance of UK dirty surplus accounting flows , 1999 .

[12]  Mary E. Barth FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING: EVIDENCE FROM INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND THE MARKET VALUATION OF BANKS , 1994 .

[13]  Terry D. Warfield,et al.  An issues paper on comprehensive income , 1997 .

[14]  E. Fama,et al.  Forecasting Profitability and Earnings , 1999 .

[15]  Gary C. Biddle,et al.  Relative Versus Incremental Information Content , 1995 .

[16]  Q. Vuong Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[17]  Anwer S. Ahmed,et al.  Stock market valuation of gains and losses on commercial banks' investment securities An empirical analysis , 1995 .

[18]  James A. Ohlson,et al.  Changes Versus Levels In Earnings As Explanatory Variables For Returns - Some Theoretical Considerations , 1992 .

[19]  Patricia M. Dechow Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals , 1994 .

[20]  Paul Zarowin,et al.  THE ROLE OF EARNINGS LEVELS IN ANNUAL EARNINGS-RETURNS STUDIES , 1992 .

[21]  S. Kothari,et al.  An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients , 1989 .

[22]  Peter Easton,et al.  EARNINGS AS AN EXPLANATORY VARIABLE FOR RETURNS , 1991 .

[23]  K. R. Subramanyam,et al.  The pricing of discretionary accruals , 1996 .

[24]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Value-Relevance of Banks' Fair Value Disclosures Under SFAS No. 107 , 1998 .

[25]  Eli Bartov Foreign Currency Exposure of Multinational Firms: Accounting Measures and Market Valuation* , 1997 .