Kinetic and Structural Evolution of Self-gravitating, Magnetized Clouds: 2.5-Dimensional Simulations of Decaying Turbulence

The molecular component of the Galaxy is comprised of turbulent, magnetized clouds, many of which are self-gravitating and form stars. To develop an understanding of how these clouds' kinetic and structural evolution may depend on their level of turbulence, mean magnetization, and degree of self-gravity, we perform a survey of direct numerical MHD simulations in which three parameters are independently varied. Our simulations consist of solutions to the time-dependent MHD equations on a two-dimensional grid with periodic boundary conditions; an additional "half" dimension is also incorporated as dependent variables in the third Cartesian direction. Two of our survey parameters, the mean magnetization parameter β≡c2sound/v2Alfven and the Jeans number nJ≡Lcloud/LJeans, allow us to model clouds that either meet or fail conditions for magneto-Jeans stability and magnetic criticality. Our third survey parameter, the sonic Mach number ≡σvelocity/csound, allows us to initiate turbulence of either sub- or super-Alfvenic amplitude; we employ an isothermal equation of state throughout. We evaluate the times for each cloud model to become gravitationally bound and measure each model's kinetic energy loss over the fluid-flow crossing time. We compare the evolution of density and magnetic field structural morphology and quantify the differences in the density contrast generated by internal stresses for models of differing mean magnetization. We find that the values of β and nJ, but not the initial Mach number , determine the time for cloud gravitational binding and collapse: for mean cloud density nH2=100 cm-3, unmagnetized models collapse after ~5 Myr, and magnetically supercritical models generally collapse after 5-10 Myr (although the smallest magneto-Jeans stable clouds survive gravitational collapse until t~15 Myr), while magnetically subcritical clouds remain uncollapsed over the entire simulations; these cloud collapse times scale with the mean density as tg∝n−½H2. We find, contrary to some previous expectations, less than a factor of 2 difference between turbulent decay times for models with varying magnetic field strength; the maximum decay time, for B~14 μG and nH2=100 cm-3, is 1.4 flow crossing times tcross=L/σvelocity (or 8 Myr for typical giant molecular cloud parameters). In all models we find turbulent amplification in the magnetic field strength up to at least the level βpert≡c2sound/δv2Alfven=0.1, with the turbulent magnetic energy between 25% and 60% of the turbulent kinetic energy after one flow crossing time. We find that for non-self-gravitating stages of evolution, when clouds have =5-10, the mass-averaged density contrast magnitudes log(ρ/) are in the range 0.2-0.5, with the contrast increasing both toward low and high β. Although our conclusions about density statistics may be affected by our isothermal assumption, we note that only the more strongly magnetized models appear to be consistent with estimates of clump/interclump density contrasts inferred in Galactic giant molecular clouds.

[1]  Jonathan P. Williams,et al.  The Galactic Distribution of OB Associations in Molecular Clouds , 1997 .

[2]  Jonathan P. Williams,et al.  The Density Structure in the Rosette Molecular Cloud: Signposts of Evolution , 1995 .

[3]  A. R. Rivolo,et al.  A Face-on View of the First Galactic Quadrant in Molecular Clouds , 1989 .

[4]  A. R. Rivolo,et al.  Mass, luminosity, and line width relations of Galactic molecular clouds , 1987 .

[5]  E. Ostriker,et al.  Can Nonlinear Hydromagnetic Waves Support a Self-gravitating Cloud? , 1996, astro-ph/9601095.

[6]  A. Goodman,et al.  The Magnetic Fields in the Ophiuchus and Taurus Molecular Clouds , 1996 .

[7]  M. Skrutskie,et al.  in Protostars and Planets III , 1993 .

[8]  F. Adams,et al.  Star Formation in Molecular Clouds: Observation and Theory , 1987 .

[9]  U. Frisch,et al.  Helical and Nonhelical Turbulent Dynamos , 1981 .

[10]  A. Goodman,et al.  THE MAGNETIC FIELD IN THE OPHIUCHUS DARK CLOUD COMPLEX , 1994 .

[11]  Andreas Burkert,et al.  Kinetic Energy Decay Rates of Supersonic and Super-Alfvénic Turbulence in Star-Forming Clouds , 1998 .

[12]  A. A. Galeev,et al.  Nonlinear plasma theory , 1969 .

[13]  A. Goodman,et al.  Magnetic molecular clouds: indirect evidence for magnetic support and ambipolar diffusion , 1988 .

[14]  A. Goodman,et al.  Does near-infrared polarimetry reveal the magnetic field in cold dark clouds? , 1995 .

[15]  Alyssa A. Goodman,et al.  OH Zeeman observations of dark clouds , 1993 .

[16]  L. Spitzer,et al.  Note on the collapse of magnetic interstellar clouds. , 1976 .

[17]  J. Hawley,et al.  Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows: A Constrained transport method , 1988 .

[18]  M. Norman,et al.  ZEUS-2D : a radiation magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysical flows in two space dimensions. II : The magnetohydrodynamic algorithms and tests , 1992 .

[19]  A. Carramiñana,et al.  Interstellar Turbulence, Proceedings of the 2nd Guillermo Haro Conference , 1999 .

[20]  A. Pouquet,et al.  A Turbulent Model for the Interstellar Medium. II. Magnetic Fields and Rotation , 1994 .

[21]  C. Max,et al.  Hydromagnetic waves in molecular clouds , 1975 .

[22]  C. Gammie,et al.  Local three-dimensional simulations of an accretion disk hydromagnetic dynamo , 1996 .

[23]  P. Padoan,et al.  Supersonic Turbulence in the Interstellar Medium: Stellar Extinction Determinations as Probes of the Structure and Dynamics of Dark Clouds , 1996, astro-ph/9603061.

[24]  P. Goldsmith,et al.  Molecular cooling and thermal balance of dense interstellar clouds , 1978 .

[25]  Alyssa A. Goodman,et al.  Optical polarization maps of star-forming regions in Perseus, Taurus, and Ophiuchus , 1990 .

[26]  M. Goldstein,et al.  An instability of finite amplitude circularly polarized Alfven waves. [in solar wind and corona , 1978 .

[27]  T. Passot,et al.  Density probability distribution in one-dimensional polytropic gas dynamics , 1998, physics/9802019.

[28]  J. Alves,et al.  Dust Extinction and Molecular Cloud Structure: L977 , 1998, astro-ph/9805141.

[29]  R. Larson Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds , 1980 .

[30]  T. Passot,et al.  Influence of Cooling-Induced Compressibility on the Structure of Turbulent Flows and Gravitational Collapse , 1996, astro-ph/9607046.

[31]  P. Goldsmith Molecular Clouds: An Overview , 1987 .

[32]  M. Norman,et al.  ZEUS-2D: A radiation magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysical flows in two space dimensions. I - The hydrodynamic algorithms and tests. II - The magnetohydrodynamic algorithms and tests , 1992 .

[33]  Mark S. Miesch,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Turbulence in Molecular Clouds , 1994 .

[34]  G. Melnick,et al.  Thermal Balance in Dense Molecular Clouds: Radiative Cooling Rates and Emission-Line Luminosities , 1995 .

[35]  Elizabeth A. Lada,et al.  Dust Extinction and Molecular Gas in the Dark Cloud IC 5146 , 1994 .

[36]  C. Lada,et al.  Book-Review - the Physics of Star Formation and Early Stellar Evolution , 1991 .

[37]  E. Vázquez-Semadeni Hierarchical Structure in Nearly Pressureless Flows as a Consequence of Self-similar Statistics , 1994 .

[38]  S. Chandrasekhar,et al.  Problems of Gravitational Stability in the Presence of a Magnetic Field , 1953 .

[39]  A. Blaauw,et al.  OB Associations and the Fossil Record of Star Formation , 1991 .

[40]  J. Scalo,et al.  On the Probability Density Function of Galactic Gas. I. Numerical Simulations and the Significance of the Polytropic Index , 1997, astro-ph/9710075.

[41]  C. McKee Photoionization-regulated Star Formation and the Structure of Molecular Clouds , 1989 .

[42]  R. Wilson,et al.  Filamentary structure in the Orion molecular cloud , 1986 .

[43]  B. Elmegreen Cloud/Intercloud Structure from Nonlinear Magnetic Waves , 1997 .

[44]  D. A. Schleuning,et al.  Far-infrared and Submillimeter Polarization of OMC-1: Evidence for Magnetically Regulated Star Formation , 1997 .

[45]  Takashi S. Nakamura,et al.  Equilibria and evolutions of magnetized, rotating, isothermal clouds. II - the extreme case: nonrotating clouds , 1988 .

[46]  J. Silk,et al.  Clumpy molecular clouds - A dynamic model self-consistently regulated by T Tauri star formation , 1980 .