Sensing Dictionary Optimization Method for Target Localization in Sensor Networks

Compressed sensing method provides a new idea for target localization in sensor networks. However, in practical applications, due to the influence of sensor deployment and grid size, the sensing matrix may not satisfy restricted isometry property (RIP) in sparse signal reconstruction. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a sensing dictionary optimization method for target localization, which is based on equiangular non-coherent unit norm tight frame sensing matrix. The method uses a random matrix as the initial preprocessing matrix. By relaxing the gram matrix iteratively and with matrix algebraic decomposition, an optimal frobenius norm tight frame is attained as the optimal sensing matrix. By preconditioning processing, the cross-correlation between the columns of the sensing matrix is reduced, which improves the estimation performance of the target localization. Simulation results show that the proposed method has better localization performance than forward-backward pursuit (FBP) method using non-optimized dictionary.

[1]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Yuexian Hou,et al.  A novel compressive sensing method based on SVD sparse random measurement matrix in wireless sensor network , 2016 .

[3]  Weiqiang Tan,et al.  An Iterative Adaptive Dictionary Learning Approach for Multiple Snapshot DOA Estimation , 2018, 2018 14th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP).

[4]  Paolo Rocca,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing Approaches for the Reconstruction of Two-Dimensional Sparse Scatterers Under TE Illuminations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  From Grammars to Parameters: Automatic Iterated Greedy Design for the Permutation Flow-Shop Problem with Weighted Tardiness , 2013, LION.

[6]  Feng Ju Fault-Tolerant Target Detection and Localization Strategy Under Sensor Network Collaborative Environment , 2015 .

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimized Projections for Compressed Sensing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Dongqing Xie,et al.  Direction finding for non-circular sources based on weighted unitary nuclear norm minimization , 2017, 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT).

[9]  Sungyoung Lee,et al.  Compressive sensing: From theory to applications, a survey , 2013, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[10]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Compressive sensing based target counting and localization exploiting joint sparsity , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[11]  P. Rocca,et al.  Directions-of-Arrival Estimation Through Bayesian Compressive Sensing Strategies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  Compressed sensing signal recovery via forward-backward pursuit , 2012, Digit. Signal Process..

[13]  P. Bickel,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF LASSO AND DANTZIG SELECTOR , 2008, 0801.1095.

[14]  Hui Huang,et al.  Localization Algorithm of Sparse Targets Based on LU-decomposition: Localization Algorithm of Sparse Targets Based on LU-decomposition , 2014 .

[15]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A Survey of Distance-Based Wireless Sensor Network Localization Techniques , 2012, Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun..

[16]  Hong Sun,et al.  Compressive sensing for cluster structured sparse signals: variational Bayes approach , 2016, IET Signal Process..

[17]  Braham Himed,et al.  Complex multitask Bayesian compressive sensing , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..