Perception of Average Value in Multiclass Scatterplots

The visual system can make highly efficient aggregate judgements about a set of objects, with speed roughly independent of the number of objects considered. While there is a rich literature on these mechanisms and their ramifications for visual summarization tasks, this prior work rarely considers more complex tasks requiring multiple judgements over long periods of time, and has not considered certain critical aggregation types, such as the localization of the mean value of a set of points. In this paper, we explore these questions using a common visualization task as a case study: relative mean value judgements within multi-class scatterplots. We describe how the perception literature provides a set of expected constraints on the task, and evaluate these predictions with a large-scale perceptual study with crowd-sourced participants. Judgements are no harder when each set contains more points, redundant and conflicting encodings, as well as additional sets, do not strongly affect performance, and judgements are harder when using less salient encodings. These results have concrete ramifications for the design of scatterplots.

[1]  Jing Li,et al.  A model of symbol size discrimination in scatterplots , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  T. Callaghan Interference and dominance in texture segregation: Hue, geometric form, and line orientation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[5]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  The Perception of Correlation in Scatterplots , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  Michael Gleicher,et al.  Quantity estimation in visualizations of tagged text , 2013, CHI.

[7]  Don P. Mitchell,et al.  Spectrally optimal sampling for distribution ray tracing , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  A Taxonomy of Visual Cluster Separation Factors , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[9]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[10]  W. H. Tedford,et al.  The size-color illusion. , 1977, The Journal of general psychology.

[11]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  ColorBrewer.org: An Online Tool for Selecting Colour Schemes for Maps , 2003 .

[13]  Steven L Franconeri,et al.  Average orientation is more accessible through object boundaries than surface features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Steven L Franconeri,et al.  Common-Fate Grouping as Feature Selection , 2011, Psychological science.

[15]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[16]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[17]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Why salience is not enough: reflections on top-down selection in vision. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades , 1999, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Buonomano,et al.  Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Daniel J Simons,et al.  Ensemble representations: effects of set size and item heterogeneity on average size perception. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Harold Pashler,et al.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.

[24]  A. Treisman Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups , 2005, Vision Research.

[26]  John P. Lewis,et al.  Eurographics/ Ieee-vgtc Symposium on Visualization 2009 Selecting Good Views of High-dimensional Data Using Class Consistency , 2022 .

[27]  Steven Franconeri,et al.  Comparing averages in time series data , 2012, CHI.

[28]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[29]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  D. Burr,et al.  Visual Clutter Causes High-Magnitude Errors , 2006, PLoS biology.

[31]  David Whitney,et al.  How Capacity Limits of Attention Influence Information Visualization Effectiveness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[32]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[34]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[35]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Ares Lagae,et al.  A Comparison of Methods for Generating Poisson Disk Distributions , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[37]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[38]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design , 2010, CHI.

[39]  G. Fouriezos,et al.  Visual statistical decisions , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  T. Callaghan Dimensional interaction of hue and brightness in preattentive field segregation , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Ronald A. Rensink The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[42]  Robert Kosara,et al.  Do Mechanical Turks dream of square pie charts? , 2010, BELIV '10.

[43]  S. Franconeri The Nature and Status of Visual Resources , 2013 .

[44]  Jing Li,et al.  A model of symbol lightness discrimination in sparse scatterplots , 2010, 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[45]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[46]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[47]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects , 2009, Cognition.

[49]  Jason M Haberman,et al.  Correspondences Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces , 2007 .

[50]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[51]  L H HARDY,et al.  Tests for detection and analysis of color blindness; an evaluation of the Ishihara test. , 1945, Archives of ophthalmology.

[52]  R. E. Christ Review and Analysis of Color Coding Research for Visual Displays , 1975 .

[53]  Dale S. Klopfer,et al.  The perception of scatterplots , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  S. L. Franconeri,et al.  Asymmetric Coding of Categorical Spatial Relations in Both Language and Vision , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[55]  W. Scott Spangler,et al.  Class visualization of high-dimensional data with applications , 2002, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[56]  James T. Enns,et al.  High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing , 1996, TCHI.

[57]  Sarah A. Helseth,et al.  Flexible visual processing of spatial relationships , 2012, Cognition.

[58]  William S. Cleveland,et al.  A Color-Caused Optical Illusion on a Statistical Graph , 1983 .

[59]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention. , 2009, Acta psychologica.