The value of routine dilated pupil screening examination.

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine dilated fundus examination in improving visual outcomes. The cost of routine dilated fundus examination was related to the number of preventable cases of vision-threatening peripheral retinal disease. Patients with these diseases who had no risk factors were ascertained in a population of 1.75 million adults for a period of 6 months. Those whose last examination had been undilated were identified because only for them could routine dilated examination (RDE) have been substituted for undilated examination. The number of preventable cases was calculated for multiples of a 10% probability of prevention. The cost of RDE was determined from the number of undilated examinations in the same population and period and the cost of a single RDE. The number of patients who underwent undilated examination was estimated by random medical record review. The additional cost of a single RDE was determined from estimated examination times and payroll costs. Among patients without risk factors, 38 were identified for whom undilated examination rather than RDE had been performed. If prevention had been 10% effective, the substitution of 50,000 RDEs for undilated examinations costing the provider $433,000 would have been required per prevented case. These results suggest that most peripheral retinal diseases cannot be prevented by RDE. Routine dilated examination is an expensive test per prevented case. Published clinical guidelines lack evidence to recommend its use.

[1]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  P. Lichter Providing value for vision care services. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[3]  L. Russell,et al.  Reviews and Notes: Educated Guesses: Making Policy about Medical Screening Tests , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  N. Krieger Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[5]  Yolton Rl,et al.  A comparison of diagnostic outcomes with and without pupillary dilatation. , 1990 .

[6]  N. Byer Long-term natural history of lattice degeneration of the retina. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[7]  M F Marmor,et al.  Rapid enhancement of retinal adhesion by laser photocoagulation. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Earle,et al.  Enucleation versus plaque irradiation for choroidal melanoma. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[9]  N. Byer Long-term natural history study of senile retinoschisis with implications for management. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[10]  W. O'Fallon,et al.  The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  N E Byer,et al.  The natural history of asymptomatic retinal breaks. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Hiatt,et al.  The frequency of kidney and urinary tract diseases in a defined population. , 1982, Kidney international.

[13]  C. K. Brown,et al.  Epidemiology of retinal detachment. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  N. Byer Cystic retinal tufts and their relationship to retinal detachment. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  D. Strickland,et al.  Melanomas of eye: stability of rates. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  W. Benson Retinal detachment: Diagnosis and management , 1980 .

[17]  K. Kupka,et al.  International classification of diseases: ninth revision. , 1978, WHO chronicle.

[18]  J. Fraumeni,et al.  Melanomas of the eye and other noncutaneous sites: epidemiologic aspects. , 1976, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Frank W. Newell,et al.  Ophthalmology, principles and concepts , 1969 .