Diffusion of research-based instructional strategies: the case of SCALE-UP

BackgroundMany innovative teaching strategies have been developed under the assumption that documenting successful student learning outcomes at the development site is enough to spread the innovation successfully to secondary sites. Since this ‘show them and they will adopt’ model has yet to produce the desired large-scale transformation, this study examines one innovative teaching strategy that has demonstrated success in spreading. This instructional strategy, Student-Centered Active Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogies (SCALE-UP), modifies both the pedagogy and classroom design to maximize interaction and activity-based learning. A web survey was used to develop a census of instructors who have been influenced by SCALE-UP.ResultsSCALE-UP, which started in large enrollment university physics, has spread widely across disciplines and institutions. The survey identified that SCALE-UP style instruction is currently used in over a dozen disciplines at a minimum of 314 departments in at least 189 higher education institutions in 21 countries. Many more respondents indicated learning about SCALE-UP via interpersonal channels, such as talks/workshops and colleagues, than via mass media channels, such as the Internet and publications. We estimate the dissemination of SCALE-UP in physics may be at the tipping point between adoption by adventurous early users and the more mainstream majority. Implementers demonstrate pedagogical and structural variation in their use of SCALE-UP.ConclusionsLeveraging interpersonal networks can help accelerate dissemination of educational innovations and should be used more prominently in change strategies. Since SCALE-UP may be nearing a tipping point within the discipline of physics, now may be the time to modify change strategies to appeal to more typical faculty rather than the early adopters. This may include using successful secondary implementers as like-minded intermediaries to reach out to people considering the use of the innovation in different institutional settings for more practical and relatable advice. For SCALE-UP, having a specialized classroom may improve the likelihood of continued use at an institution. We also hypothesize that having a special classroom may start departmental conversations about innovative teaching and may make instructors less likely to revert back to traditional methods.

[1]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States , 2009 .

[2]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics. , 2000 .

[3]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Sustaining Change: Instructor Effects in Transformed Large Lecture Courses , 2007 .

[4]  C. Henderson,et al.  Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature , 2011 .

[5]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  The Impact of Physics Education Research on the Teaching of Introductory Quantitative Physics , 2009 .

[7]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics , 2007 .

[8]  John W. Belcher,et al.  Technology active learning , 2003 .

[9]  Jennifer L. Momsen,et al.  What We Say is Not What We Do: Effective Evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs , 2011 .

[10]  Dee U Silverthorn,et al.  It's difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. , 2006, Advances in physiology education.

[11]  R. Wolfe ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[12]  Manjula D. Sharma,et al.  Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten year study , 2010 .

[13]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[14]  Disseminating development initiatives in British higher education: a case study , 1997 .

[15]  S. Nicholson,et al.  Roster of Physics Departments with Enrollment and Degree Data, 2014: Results from the 2014 Survey of Enrollments and Degrees. Focus On. , 2012 .

[16]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[17]  Elizabeth S. Charles,et al.  When Teacher-Centered Instructors Are Assigned to Student-Centered Classrooms. , 2014 .

[18]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation , 1977 .

[19]  Robert J. Beichner The Student-Centered Active Learning Environment for Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2011 .

[20]  Richard McCray,et al.  Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : report of a workshop , 2003 .

[21]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[22]  Susan B. Millar,et al.  The “Hand-off” as a Flawed Approach to Disseminating Innovation: Lessons from Chemistry , 2002 .

[23]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[24]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[25]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty , 2010 .

[26]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change , 1975 .

[27]  Edward W. Pauly,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. 2: Factors Affecting Change Agent Projects. , 1975 .

[28]  Elaine Seymour,et al.  Tracking the Processes of Change in US Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology , 2002 .

[29]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics , 2005 .

[30]  Nedjeljko Frančula The National Academies Press , 2013 .

[31]  Juan R. Burciaga,et al.  Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite , 2004 .

[32]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[33]  A. Stone,et al.  The science of self-report. Implications for research and practice , 1999 .

[34]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[35]  S. Nutley Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice : Working Paper 10 Conceptual Synthesis 1 : Learning from the Diffusion of Innovations , 2002 .

[36]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments , 2010 .

[37]  C. Wieman,et al.  Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progressxs , 2010 .

[38]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[39]  C. Henderson,et al.  Physics Faculty and Educational Researchers: Divergent Expectations as Barriers to the Diffusion of Innovations , 2006, physics/0608295.

[40]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[41]  B. David The iron cage revisited : Institutional isomorphism and collec... , 2007 .

[42]  Michael Huberman,et al.  Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education: A literature review , 1994 .

[43]  R. Beichner The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[44]  Charles Henderson,et al.  The challenges of instructional change under the best of circumstances: A case study of one college physics instructor , 2005 .

[45]  D. Ball,et al.  Relations Between Policy and Practice: A Commentary , 1990 .

[46]  C. Henderson Promoting Instructional Change in New Faculty: An Evaluation of the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop , 2007 .

[47]  L W Green,et al.  Dissemination and utilization of health promotion and disease prevention knowledge: theory, research and experience. , 1996, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[48]  B. Wildemuth An empirically grounded model of the adoption of intellectual technologies , 1992 .