Modelling uncertainty in the sustainability of Intelligent Transport Systems for highways using probabilistic data fusion

The implementation of ITS to increase the efficiency of saturated highways has become increasingly prevalent. It is a high level objective for many international governments and operators that highways should be managed in a way that is both sustainable i.e. environmental, social and economically sound and supportive of a Low-Carbon-Energy Future. Some clarity is therefore needed to understand how Intelligent Transport Systems perform within the constraints of that objective. The paper describes the development of performance criteria that reflect the contributions of Information Communication Technology (ICT) emissions, vehicle emissions and the embedded carbon within the physical transport infrastructure that typically comprises one type of Intelligent Transport System i.e. Active Traffic Management - a scheme that is used to reduce inter-urban congestion. The performance criteria form part of a new framework methodology 'EnvFUSION' (Environmental Fusion for ITS) outlined here. This is illustrated using a case study where environmental performance and pollution baselines (collected from independent experts, academic, governmental sources and suppliers) are processed using an attributional Lifecycle Assessment tool. The tool assesses the production and operational processes of the physical infrastructure of Active Traffic Management using inputs from the 'Ecoinvent' database. The ICT component (responsible for data links) is assessed using direct observation, whilst vehicle emissions are estimated using data from a National Atmospheric Emissions Laboratory. Analytical Hierarchy Process and Dempster-Shafer theory are used to create a prioritised performance hierarchy: the Intelligent Transport Sustainability Index, which includes weighted criteria based on stakeholder expertise. A synthesis of the individual criteria is then used to reflect the overall performance of the Active Traffic Management scheme in terms of sustainability (low-carbon-energy and socio-economic) objectives. Robust modelling approach in terms of relevance towards modelling sustainability of intelligent transport.ITS performance data collected from multiple sources and aggregated via D-S theory.Benefits include integrating transport, ICT and operational (energy) variables in a sustainability index.Attributional LCA indicates a high degree of CO2 within the infrastructure.Sustainability performance indicates priority should focus on improving data center energy consumption.

[1]  M. Beynon,et al.  The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling , 2000 .

[2]  A. Schafer,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of the potential of intelligent transport systems to reduce CO 2 emissions , 2012 .

[3]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing , 2010, Comput. J..

[4]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability - A prospective simulation study , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[6]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[7]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators , 2010 .

[8]  David Zilberman,et al.  Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies , 2011 .

[9]  M. Karlström,et al.  Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment , 2007 .

[10]  Consequential and Attributional Approaches to LCA : a Guide to Policy Makers with Specific Reference to Greenhouse Gas LCA of Biofuels April 2008 , 2009 .

[11]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  Emergency alternative evaluation under group decision makers: A method of incorporating DS/AHP with extended TOPSIS , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Joyce Smith Cooper,et al.  Parameterization in Life Cycle Assessment inventory data: review of current use and the representation of uncertainty , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  Keith Weitz,et al.  Case studies examining LCA streamlining techniques , 1998 .

[14]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA , 2010 .

[15]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[16]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  A graphical representation for consequential life cycle assessment of future technologies. Part 1: methodological framework , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Tim Higgs,et al.  Review of LCA methods for ICT products and the impact of high purity and high cost materials , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[19]  Aidan Holt,et al.  Assessing ‘carbon balance’ of intelligent transport schemes , 2008 .

[20]  H. A. Udo de Haes,et al.  Quantitative life cycle assessment of products: 1:Goal definition and inventory , 1993 .

[21]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments , 2011 .

[22]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  How can our cars become less polluting? An assessment of the environmental improvement potential of cars , 2010 .

[23]  Tooru Matsumiya Steelmaking technology for a sustainable society , 2011 .

[24]  Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis,et al.  Waste Management for the Food Industries , 2007 .

[25]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[26]  Mohan Yellishetty,et al.  Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: Sustainability issues, problems and prospects , 2011 .

[27]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[28]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[29]  P S Unwin,et al.  M42 Active Traffic Management monitoring and evaluation: Results from Hard Shoulder Running up to 60 mph , 2010 .

[30]  Methodology and utilization of simplified eco-assessments for policy making , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[31]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[32]  Viet T. Dao,et al.  From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[33]  M. Sambasivan,et al.  Evaluation of critical success factors of implementation of ISO 14001 using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study from Malaysia , 2008 .

[34]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Integrating fuzzy multicriteria analysis and uncertainty evaluation in life cycle assessment , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  Rainer Zah,et al.  The applicability of non-local LCI data for LCA , 2010 .

[36]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Intelligent Transport Systems , 2009 .

[37]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators , 2007 .

[38]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  A Generalization of Bayesian Inference , 1968, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[39]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials , 2007 .

[40]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[41]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments , 2009 .

[42]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions: An Introduction , 2008, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[43]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  THE APPLICABILITY OF MULTICRITERIA-ANALYSIS TO THE EVALUATION OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS (ITS). IN: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS AND CASE STUDIES , 2004 .

[44]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  DS/AHP method: A mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[46]  Carla Pieragostini,et al.  On process optimization considering LCA methodology. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  Richard A. Denison ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE-CYCLE COMPARISONS OF RECYCLING, LANDFILLING, AND INCINERATION: A Review of Recent Studies , 1996 .

[48]  Lauren Basson,et al.  An integrated approach for the consideration of uncertainty in decision making supported by Life Cycle Assessment , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  G. Müller,et al.  The Scientific Basis , 1995 .

[50]  Susan Grant-Muller,et al.  Integrated strategic performance toolkit for cooperative scheme comparisons in inter-urban intelligent transport services , 2012 .

[51]  Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis,et al.  3 – ISO 14040: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) – Principles and Guidelines , 2008 .

[52]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[53]  Baizhan Li,et al.  A holistic method to assess building energy efficiency combining D-S theory and the evidential reasoning approach , 2012 .

[54]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[55]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[56]  Brian Connor,et al.  Sustainability and greenhouse gases: What are the issues for New Zealand? , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[57]  Milan Dado,et al.  Present and future challenges of ICT for intelligent transportation technologies and services , 2009, 2009 1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology.

[58]  Michael Spielmann,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Transport Services: Background Data for Freight Transport (10 pp) , 2005 .

[59]  C. Fuhs,et al.  Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management , 2007 .

[60]  Gavin M. Mudd,et al.  The steel industry, abiotic resource depletion and life cycle assessment: a real or perceived issue? , 2011 .

[61]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues , 2011 .

[62]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis , 1993 .

[63]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .