The Impact of Whatsapp Use on Success in Education Process

The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of WhatsApp use for education and determine the opinions of students towards the process. The study was designed in mixed research model which combines both qualitative and quantitative data. In the quantitative aspect of the study, quasi-experimental design, with a pretest-posttest control group, was used and the data were analyzed by two factor variance analysis for mixed measurements. The analysis indicated that both learning environments have different effects on the success of students and that supporting the traditional environment by using WhatsApp is more effective for the increase of success. For the qualitative aspect of the study, content analysis techniques were employed to analyze the data which were collected by open-ended question forms. The analysis showed that students developed positive opinions towards the use of WhatsApp in their courses. They demanded the same practice in their other courses as well. They reported that learning could also take place unconsciously and the messages with images were more effective for their learning. However, a few students have expressed adverse opinions about the timing of some posts and the redundant posts within the group. Finally, it is suggested that use of WhatsApp in education process be encouraged as a supportive technology.

[1]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[2]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[3]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[4]  R. Arteaga Sánchez,et al.  Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[6]  Rodrigo de Oliveira,et al.  What's up with whatsapp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS , 2013, MobileHCI '13.

[7]  Helmi Norman,et al.  Exploring the Roles of Social Participation in Mobile Social Media Learning: A Social Network Analysis. , 2015 .

[8]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[10]  J. Cain,et al.  Using Facebook as an Informal Learning Environment , 2011, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[11]  R. Bogdan,et al.  Bogdan, Robert C., and Sari Knopp Biklen, Qualitative Reseach for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, 2d Ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1992. , 1992 .

[12]  Bernard R. McCoy,et al.  Digital Distractions in the Classroom: Student Classroom Use of Digital Devices for Non-Class Related Purposes , 2013 .

[13]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  J. Meek,et al.  Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’ , 2009 .

[15]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Instant Messaging in Two Educational Contexts , 2008 .

[16]  Caroline Lego Muñoz,et al.  Facebook and education: A classroom connection? , 2011 .

[17]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[18]  Patient Rambe,et al.  Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Effects of Conversational Involvement Cues on Understanding and Emotions in Instant Messaging Conversations , 2016 .

[20]  Jeffrey H. Kuznekoff,et al.  Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Examining the Effects of Texting, Twitter, and Message Content on Student Learning , 2015 .

[21]  Sheelah M. Sweeny.  Writing for the Instant Messaging and Text Messaging Generation: Using New Literacies to Support Writing Instruction. , 2010 .

[22]  Nathan H. Lents,et al.  Increasing Student-Teacher Interactions at an Urban Commuter Campus through Instant Messaging and Online Office Hours , 2010 .

[23]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks? , 2011, Journal of Advertising Research.

[24]  M. Harrison,et al.  U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging , 2012 .

[25]  Serkan Yilmaz,et al.  Deneysel Desenler: Öntest-Sontest Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi , 2013 .

[26]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[27]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[28]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .

[29]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[30]  Dan Bouhnik,et al.  WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[31]  Patient Rambe,et al.  Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively-generated resources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African University , 2013 .

[32]  Ashraf Jalal Yousef Zaidieh.  The Use of Social Networking in Education : Challenges and Opportunities , 2012 .

[33]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[34]  Roelien Goede,et al.  WhatsApp with BlackBerry; can Messengers (BBM) be MXit? , 2012 .