Assessing the acceptability of intervention components, delivery methods, and outcome measures of an adapted preschool obesity prevention programme: ToyBox-Scotland.

BACKGROUND Childhood obesity is a global public health issue. Interventions to prevent the onset of obesity in the early years are often implemented in preschool settings. The ToyBox intervention was delivered across Europe and targeted energy-balance related behaviours in preschools and children's homes through teacher-led activities and parental education materials, and was adapted for use in Scotland. This study assessed the acceptability of the 18 week adapted intervention to both parents and teachers. METHODS Mixed methods were employed to collect both qualitative and quantitative data. Preschool teachers and children's parents/caregivers completed post-intervention feedback surveys, from which acceptability scores were calculated and presented as proportions. Focus groups were conducted with preschool teachers, while parents/caregivers participated in semi-structured interviews.. A thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data following the development of a coding framework. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using SPSS and NVivo 10, respectively. RESULTS Teachers rated the intervention as highly acceptable based on post-intervention feedback surveys (80%; mean score 8.8/11). Lower acceptability scores were observed for parents/caregivers (49%; 3.9/8). Nine teachers participated in focus groups (n=3). User-friendliness of the intervention materials, integration of the intervention with the curriculum and flexibility of the intervention were identified as facilitators to delivery. Barriers to delivery were time, insufficient space and conflicting policies within preschools with regard to changing classroom layouts. Parental interviews (n=4) revealed a lack of time to be a major barrier which prevented parents from participating in home-based activities. Parents perceived the materials to be simple to understand and visually appealing. CONCLUSIONS This study identified a number of barriers and facilitators to the delivery and evaluation of the ToyBox-Scotland preschool obesity prevention programme, which should be considered before any further scale-up of the intervention.

[1]  G. Cardon,et al.  A feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a preschool obesity prevention intervention: ToyBox-Scotland , 2019, Pilot and Feasibility Studies.

[2]  D. Ward,et al.  A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[3]  G. Cardon,et al.  Adapting the ToyBox obesity prevention intervention for use in Scottish preschools: protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial , 2018, BMJ Open.

[4]  Berthold Koletzko,et al.  Effect and process evaluation of a kindergarten-based, family-involved intervention with a randomized cluster design on sedentary behaviour in 4- to 6- year old European preschool children: The ToyBox-study , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  A. Staiano,et al.  Family-Based Behavioral Treatment for Childhood Obesity: Caretaker-Reported Barriers and Facilitators. , 2017, The Ochsner journal.

[6]  Annemarie Koster,et al.  Comparison of Sedentary Estimates between activPAL and Hip- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  G. Cardon,et al.  Effect and Process Evaluation of a Cluster Randomized Control Trial on Water Intake and Beverage Consumption in Preschoolers from Six European Countries: The ToyBox-Study , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Z. Yin,et al.  ¡Miranos! (Look at Us! We Are Healthy!) , 2016, Health promotion practice.

[9]  John Wright,et al.  Assessing the feasibility of evaluating and delivering a physical activity intervention for pre-school children: a pilot randomised controlled trial , 2016, Pilot and Feasibility Studies.

[10]  D. Ward,et al.  Recruitment and retention in obesity prevention and treatment trials targeting minority or low-income children: a review of the clinical trials registration database , 2015, Trials.

[11]  I. Pigeot,et al.  Process evaluation of the IDEFICS school intervention: putting the evaluation of the effect on children's objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in context , 2015, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[12]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  M. Whitt-Glover,et al.  Intervention fidelity in a teacher-led program to promote physical activity in preschool-age children. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[14]  G. Cardon,et al.  Differences in Energy Balance-Related Behaviours in European Preschool Children: The ToyBox-Study , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  M. Pallan,et al.  Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[16]  A. DiCenso,et al.  The use of triangulation in qualitative research. , 2014, Oncology nursing forum.

[17]  R. Pate,et al.  The 3-year evolution of a preschool physical activity intervention through a collaborative partnership between research interventionists and preschool teachers. , 2014, Health education research.

[18]  G. Cardon,et al.  The effect of a kindergarten-based, family-involved intervention on objectively measured physical activity in Belgian preschool boys and girls of high and low SES: the ToyBox-study , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[19]  G. Cardon,et al.  Validity of the ActivPAL™ and the ActiGraph monitors in preschoolers. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Katrina M. Krause,et al.  Parent-focused change to prevent obesity in preschoolers: results from the KAN-DO study. , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[21]  D. Neumark-Sztainer,et al.  Healthful eating and physical activity in the home environment: results from multifamily focus groups. , 2012, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[22]  Y. Manios.  The ‘ToyBox‐study’ obesity prevention programme in early childhood: an introduction , 2012, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[23]  A. Dyer,et al.  Hip‐Hop to Health Jr. Obesity Prevention Effectiveness Trial: Postintervention Results , 2011, Obesity.

[24]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Childhood obesity , 2010, The Lancet.

[25]  T. Cole,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of the MEND Program: A Family‐based Community Intervention for Childhood Obesity , 2010, Obesity.

[26]  J. Durlak,et al.  Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[27]  Nushan P Gunawardana,et al.  Refusing to provide a prenatal test: can it ever be ethical? , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  A. Dyer,et al.  Hip‐Hop to Health Jr. for Latino Preschool Children , 2006, Obesity.

[29]  John J Reilly,et al.  Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  Gösta Samuelson,et al.  Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health , 2004 .

[31]  G. Finnerty.  Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers , 2003 .

[32]  Jung-Min Lee,et al.  Accuracy of inclinometer functions of the activPAL and ActiGraph GT3X+: A focus on physical activity. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[33]  J. Ritchie,et al.  QUALITATIVE RESEARCH PRACTICE A GUIDE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE STUDENTS AND RESEARCHERS , 2013 .

[34]  E. Waters,et al.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.