Latent mixed Markov modelling of smoking transitions using Monte Carlo bootstrapping

It has been established that measures and reports of smoking behaviours are subject to substantial measurement errors. Thus, the manifest Markov model which does not consider measurement error in observed responses may not be adequate to mathematically model changes in adolescent smoking behaviour over time. For this purpose we fit several Mixed Markov Latent Class (MMLC) models using data sets from two longitudinal panel studies—the third Waterloo Smoking Prevention study and the UWO smoking study, which have varying numbers of measurements on adolescent smoking behaviour. However, the conventional statistics used for testing goodness of fit of these models do not follow the theoretical chi-square distribution when there is data sparsity. The two data sets analysed had varying degrees of sparsity. This problem can be solved by estimating the proper distribution of fit measures using Monte Carlo bootstrap simulation. In this study, we showed that incorporating response uncertainty in smoking behaviour significantly improved the fit of a single Markov chain model. However, the single chain latent Markov model did not adequately fit the two data sets indicating that the smoking process was heterogeneous with regard to latent Markov chains. It was found that a higher percentage of students (except for never smokers) changed their smoking behaviours over time at the manifest level compared to the latent or true level. The smoking process generally accelerated with time. The students had a tendency to underreport their smoking behaviours while response uncertainty was estimated to be considerably less for the Waterloo smoking study which adopted the ‘bogus pipeline’ method for reducing measurement error while the UWO study did not. For the two-chain latent mixed Markov models, incorporating a ‘stayer’ chain to an unrestricted Markov chain led to a significant improvement in model fit for the UWO study only. For both data sets, the assumption for the existence of an independence chain did not lead to significant improvement in model fit. The unrestricted two-chain latent mixed Markov model led to a significant improvement of model fit compared to a simple latent Markov model, but this model was overparameterized when the latent transition probabilities and=or response probabilities were assumed nonstationary. For the other models, the manifest=latent transition probabilities and response probabilities (for the four-wave Waterloo study only) were tested to be nonstationary for both data sets.

[1]  D. R. Heise Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. , 1969 .

[2]  Robert R. Bush,et al.  The Industrial Mobility of Labor as a Probability Process. , 1956 .

[3]  D. Rindskopf,et al.  The value of latent class analysis in medical diagnosis. , 1986, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  John Uebersax,et al.  Statistical Modeling of Expert Ratings on Medical Treatment Appropriateness , 1993 .

[5]  J. Pannekoek,et al.  Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Categorical Data Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  D. Fergusson,et al.  A latent class model of smoking experimentation in children. , 1989, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[7]  Carsten Stig Poulsen,et al.  LATENT STRUCTURE ANALYSIS WITH CHOICE MODELING APPLICATIONS , 1983 .

[8]  A. McKennell Bias in the reported incidence of smoking by children. , 1980, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  J. Koval,et al.  The degree and type of relationship between psychosocial variables and smoking status for students in grade 8: is there a dose-response relationship? , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[10]  R J Cook,et al.  Estimation of Operating Characteristics for Dependent Diagnostic Tests Based on Latent Markov Models , 2000, Biometrics.

[11]  Virginia A. Clark,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Mover-Stayer Models , 1983 .

[12]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Consequences of Adolescent Drug Use: Impact on the Lives of Young Adults , 1988 .

[13]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  A Latent Markov Model to Correct for Measurement Error , 1986 .

[14]  Otis Dudley Duncan,et al.  Panel Analysis: Latent Probability Models for Attitude and Behavior Processes. , 1975 .

[15]  F. V. D. Pol,et al.  MIXED MARKOV LATENT CLASS MODELS , 1990 .

[16]  R. Langeheine,et al.  A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time , 1990 .

[17]  Marylee C. Taylor The Black-and-White Model of Attitude Stability: A Latent Class Examination of Opinion and Nonopinion in the American Public , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[19]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  ESTIMATION AND TESTING OF SIMPLEX MODELS , 1970 .

[20]  Karl G. Jöreskog ESTIMATION AND TESTING OF SIMPLEX MODELS , 1970 .

[21]  H. Akaike Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[22]  Elja Arjas,et al.  Transmission of Pneumococcal Carriage in Families: A Latent Markov Process Model for Binary Longitudinal Data , 2000 .

[23]  D. Reid,et al.  Use of objective measurement in the validation of self-reported smoking in children aged 10 and 11 years: saliva thiocyanate. , 1982, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[24]  P. Gillies Accuracy in the measurement of the prevalence of smoking in young people , 1985 .

[25]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[26]  Frank van de Pol,et al.  Questions of a Novice in Latent Markov Modelling , 2002 .

[27]  J S Uebersax,et al.  Latent class analysis of diagnostic agreement. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Rolf Langeheine,et al.  Mixed Markov Models, mover-stayer models and the EM algorithm , 1989 .

[29]  L. Pederson,et al.  Change in smoking status among a cohort of late adolescents: prediction and explanation of initiation, maintenance and cessation. , 1986, International journal of epidemiology.

[30]  B. Flay,et al.  Validity of Alternative Self-Report Indices of Smoking Among Adolescents , 1990 .

[31]  Murray Aitkin,et al.  Statistical Modelling of Data on Teaching Styles , 1981 .

[32]  C. Perry,et al.  The measurement of substance use among adolescents: when is the 'bogus pipeline' method needed? , 1987, Addictive behaviors.

[33]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[34]  R. West,et al.  Saliva cotinine as an indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. , 1987, British journal of addiction.

[35]  P L Fidler,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models. , 1993, Multivariate behavioral research.

[36]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Statistical Methods for Analyzing Processes of Change , 1962, American Journal of Sociology.