The response of flow duration curves to afforestation

The hydrologic effect of replacing pasture or other short crops with trees is reasonably well understood on a mean annual basis. The impact on flow regime, as described by the annual flow duration curve (FDC) is less certain. A method to assess the impact of plantation establishment on FDCs was developed. The starting point for the analyses was the assumption that rainfall and vegetation age are the principal drivers of evapotranspiration. A key objective was to remove the variability in the rainfall signal, leaving changes in streamflow solely attributable to the evapotranspiration of the plantation. A method was developed to (1) fit a model to the observed annual time series of FDC percentiles; i.e. 10th percentile for each year of record with annual rainfall and plantation age as parameters, (2) replace the annual rainfall variation with the long term mean to obtain climate adjusted FDCs, and (3) quantify changes in FDC percentiles as plantations age. Data from 10 catchments from Australia, South Africa and New Zealand were used. The model was able to represent flow variation for the majority of percentiles at eight of the 10 catchments, particularly for the 10–50th percentiles. The adjusted FDCs revealed variable patterns in flow reductions with two types of responses (groups) being identified. Group 1 catchments show a substantial increase in the number of zero flow days, with low flows being more affected than high flows. Group 2 catchments show a more uniform reduction in flows across all percentiles. The differences may be partly explained by storage characteristics. The modelled flow reductions were in accord with published results of paired catchment experiments. An additional analysis was performed to characterise the impact of afforestation on the number of zero flow days (Nzero) for the catchments in group 1. This model performed particularly well, and when adjusted for climate, indicated a significant increase in Nzero. The zero flow day method could be used to determine change in the occurrence of any given flow in response to afforestation. The methods used in this study proved satisfactory in removing the rainfall variability, and have added useful insight into the hydrologic impacts of plantation establishment. This approach provides a methodology for understanding catchment response to afforestation, where paired catchment data is not available.

[1]  F. Kruger,et al.  The effect of afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden and Pinus patula Schlecht. et Cham. on streamflow from experimental catchments at Mokobulaan, Transvaal , 1980 .

[2]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Predicting the effect of vegetation changes on catchment average water balance , 1999 .

[3]  D. V. Wyk.  Some effects of afforestation on streamflow in the Western Cape Province, South Africa , 1987 .

[4]  R. E. Smith,et al.  Preliminary empirical models to predict reductions in total and low flows resulting from afforestation , 1997 .

[5]  Barry Fahey,et al.  Hydrological impacts of converting native forests and grasslands to pine plantations, South Island, New Zealand , 1997 .

[6]  J. Bosch,et al.  Regulating Afforestation for Water Conservation in South Africa , 1990 .

[7]  V. Smakhtin.  Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[8]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[9]  R. Grayson,et al.  Transpiration from Eucalyptus sieberi (L. Johnson) forests of different age , 2001 .

[10]  R. Vertessy,et al.  Forest age-induced changes in evapotranspiration and water yield in a eucalypt forest , 2001 .

[11]  J. Bosch.  Treatment Effects on Annual and Dry Period Streamflow at Cathedral Peak , 1979 .

[12]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[13]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Flow‐Duration Curves. I: New Interpretation and Confidence Intervals , 1994 .

[14]  J. Holmes,et al.  Water Yield from Some Afforested Catchments in Victoria , 1986 .

[15]  R. Nathan,et al.  The effect of afforestation on flow duration curves , 2003 .

[16]  D. Whitehead,et al.  Physiological regulation of productivity and water use in Eucalyptus: a review , 2004 .

[17]  V. N. Sharda,et al.  Low flow and high flow responses to converting natural grassland into bluegum (Eucalyptus globulus) in Nilgiris watersheds of South India , 2003 .

[18]  T. McMahon,et al.  Assessing the adequacy of catchment streamflow yield estimates , 1993 .

[19]  Ian Cordery,et al.  Some hydrological effects of changing forest cover from eucalypts to Pinus radiata. , 2000 .

[20]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .