Early processing variations in selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli during 30 days head-down bed rest

Abstract Dynamic variations in early selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli were explored during a 30 days period of head-down bed rest. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded at F5, F6, P5, P6 scalp locations in seven male subjects who attended to pairs of bicolored light emitting diodes that flashed sequentially to produce a perception of movement. Subjects were required to attend selectively to a critical feature of the moving target, e.g., color or direction. The tasks included: a no response task, a color selective response task, a moving direction selective response task, and a combined color–direction selective response task. Subjects were asked to perform these four tasks on: the 3rd day before bed rest; the 3rd, 15th and 30th day during the bed rest; and the 5th day after bed rest. Subjects responded quickly to the color than moving direction and combined color–direction response. And they had a longer reaction time during bed rest on the 15th and 30th day during bed rest after a relatively quicker response on the 3rd day. Using brain event-related potentials technique, we found that in the color selective response task, the mean amplitudes of P1 and N1 for target ERPs decreased in the 3rd day during bed rest and 5th day after bed rest in comparison with pre-bed rest, 15th day and 30th day during bed rest. In the combined color–direction selective response task, the P1 latencies for target ERPs on the 3rd and 30th day during bed rest were longer than on the 15th day during bed rest. As 3rd day during bed rest was in the acute adaptation period and 30th day during bed rest was in the relatively adaptation stage of head-down bed rest, the results help to clarify the effects of bed rest on different task loads and patterns of attention. It was suggested that subjects expended more time to give correct decision in the head-down tilt bed rest state. A difficulty in the recruitment of brain resources was found in feature selection task, but no variations were detected in the no response and direction selective response tasks. It is suggested that the negative shift in color selective response task on the 3rd day of bed rest are a result of fluid redistribution. And feature selection was more affected than motion selection in the head down bed rest. The variations in cognitive processing speed observed for the combined color–direction selective response task are suggested to reflect the interaction between top-down mechanisms and hierarchical physiological characteristics during 30 days head-down bed rest.

[1]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Cognitive performance aboard the life and microgravity spacelab. , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[2]  G. Geffen,et al.  Genetic Covariation between Event-Related Potential (ERP) and Behavioral Non-ERP Measures of Working-Memory, Processing Speed, and IQ , 2005, Behavior genetics.

[3]  C. Mukai,et al.  Acclimation during space flight: effects on human physiology , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[4]  G. Cheron,et al.  Effect of gravity on human spontaneous 10-Hz electroencephalographic oscillations during the arrest reaction , 2006, Brain Research.

[5]  H. Müller,et al.  Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Vision Research.

[6]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  M. Delp,et al.  Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of cerebral arteries is altered with simulated microgravity through nitric oxide synthase and EDHF mechanisms. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  A R Hargens,et al.  Depression, Mood State, and Back Pain During Microgravity Simulated by Bed Rest , 2001, Psychosomatic medicine.

[9]  Renlai Zhou,et al.  The influence on individual working memory during 15 days −6° head-down bed rest , 2011 .

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  H. Gunga,et al.  Decision making after 50 days of simulated weightlessness , 2009, Brain Research.

[12]  D I Boomsma,et al.  Heritability of anterior and posterior visual N1. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  D Manzey,et al.  Monitoring of mental performance during spaceflight. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Alessandro Angrilli,et al.  Effects of simulated microgravity on brain plasticity: A startle reflex habituation study , 2011, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Cognitive demand of human sensorimotor performance during an extended space mission: a dual-task study. , 2010, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  W Ren,et al.  [Changes of brain potentials related to auditory location discrimination during simulated weightlessness]. , 2001, Hang tian yi xue yu yi xue gong cheng = Space medicine & medical engineering.

[17]  K. Moutoussis,et al.  Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  B Fowler,et al.  A review of cognitive and perceptual-motor performance in space. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W Ren,et al.  [Effect of extremely low frequency magnetic field on brain response to selective mental arithmetic under simulated weightlessness]. , 1999, Hang tian yi xue yu yi xue gong cheng = Space medicine & medical engineering.

[21]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Large-scale neural model for visual attention: integration of experimental single-cell and fMRI data. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  E. Miller,et al.  Memory fields of neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Jerry L. Homick,et al.  The Neurolab Spacelab Mission: Neuroscience Research in Space: Results from the STS-90, Neurolab Spacelab Mission , 2003 .

[24]  C. Grady,et al.  “What” and “where” in the human auditory system , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Ruth Ann Atchley,et al.  Do the early attentional components of ERPs reflect attentional bias in depression? It depends on the stimulus presentation time , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  R E Schlegel,et al.  The NASA Performance Assessment Workstation: cognitive performance during head-down bed rest. , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[27]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Baseline Shifts do not Predict Attentional Modulation of Target Processing During Feature-Based Visual Attention , 2007, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[28]  J G Casler,et al.  Cognitive performance in space and analogous environments. , 1999, International journal of cognitive ergonomics.

[29]  Kimberly A Seaton,et al.  Cognitive functioning in long-duration head-down bed rest. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[30]  M Lipshits,et al.  The face inversion effect in microgravity: is gravity used as a spatial reference for complex object recognition? , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[31]  K. Guo,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of the interaction between attention and spatiotemporal context regularity in vision , 2011, Neuroscience.