The Impact of Enterprise Architecture Management on Design Decisions in IS Change Projects

Information systems (IS) change projects aim at developing consistent IS solutions for business needs. In order to avoid inconsistencies, redundancies, and misalignments among these projects, some form of cross-project guidance is needed. Enterprise architecture management (EAM) is a prominent discipline that aims to guide IS change projects not only for local business needs, but also for enterprise-wide and long-term goals. However, EAM’s impact often remains limited due to the complexity of IS landscapes, conflicting goal systems, and design decisions that cater local/short-term rather than enterprise-wide/long-term solutions. Assuming that EAM does not necessarily guide all these potentially relevant design decisions in IS change projects, we explore dimensions and characteristics of design decisions based on empirical focus group data. To this end, we develop a classification scheme, based on which we identify two design decision types that embody hierarchical and lateral characteristics, respectively. Using this scheme, we discuss how to (re-)consider EAM for enterprise-wide/long-term solutions in IS change projects.

[1]  W. Rouse.  Enterprise Transformation: Understanding and Enabling Fundamental Change , 2006 .

[2]  Stephan Murer,et al.  Managed Evolution: A Strategy for Very Large Information Systems , 2010 .

[3]  N. Leech,et al.  A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research , 2009 .

[4]  Robert Winter,et al.  Understanding Enterprise Architecture Management Design - An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[5]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Use of Focus Groups in Design Science Research , 2010 .

[6]  Alexander M. Ernst,et al.  State of the A rt in Enterprise Architecture Management , 2009 .

[7]  Laura Lehtola,et al.  Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE '04..

[8]  Robert Winter,et al.  Institutionalization and the Effectiveness of Enterprise Architecture Management , 2013, ICIS.

[9]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Application of Enterprise Models for Engineering Enterprise Transformation , 2010, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..

[10]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Implementing Architectural Thinking - A Case Study at Commerzbank AG , 2015, CAiSE Workshops.

[11]  Robert Winter,et al.  Enterprise Architecture and Transformation: The Differences and the Synergy Potential of Enterprise Architecture and Business Transformation Management , 2013 .

[12]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: empirical insight from the international financial services industry , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Architectural Coordination of Transformation: Implications from Game Theory , 2012, MCIS.

[14]  Marc M. Lankhorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd Edition , 2005, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[15]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Point-Counterpoint: Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Transformation as Related but Distinct Concepts , 2012 .

[16]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Standard Making: a Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems Misq Special Issue Workshop Effectively Managing Information Systems Architecture Standards: an Intra-organization Perspective Standard Making: a Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems Misq Special Issue Workshop , 2022 .

[17]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: Enabling Integration, Agility And Change , 2004, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[18]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Anthony J. Lattanze.  Infusing Architectural Thinking into Organizations , 2012, IEEE Software.

[20]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[21]  Stephan Aier,et al.  The role of organizational culture for grounding, management, guidance and effectiveness of enterprise architecture principles , 2014, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[22]  Steven H. Tang,et al.  Architectural thinking and modeling with the Architects' Workbench , 2006, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: Informed Steering of Enterprises in Motion , 2013, ICEIS.

[24]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[25]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Robert Winter,et al.  Architectural Thinking , 2014, Wirtschaftsinf..

[27]  Robert Winter,et al.  Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[28]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[29]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .