A comparison of four self-report smoking cessation outcome measures.

Interventions for smoking cessation have been developed by researchers in a number of distinct disciplines. As a result, a variety of different outcome measures have been developed and employed. This paper will report an analysis that compares four smoking cessation outcome measures on data gathered from three population-based studies: (1) 24-hour point prevalence abstinence, (2) 7-day point prevalence abstinence, (3) 30-day prolonged abstinence, and (4) 6-month prolonged abstinence. The three studies provided a total of 41 mean estimates for the first three measures but only 28 mean estimates for the 6-month prolonged abstinence measure. The data demonstrate an extremely high relationship between all four measures. The first three measures (24-hour point prevalence, 7-day point prevalence, and 30-day prolonged abstinence) all correlated in excess of.98 with each other. The only measure that did not demonstrate the same degree of almost perfect equivalence was 6-month prolonged abstinence, but even here the lowest correlation with the other three measures was.82. For practical purposes, the first three measures will result in the same conclusions when used as outcome measures in smoking cessation studies.

[1]  L. Dales,et al.  Characteristics predictive of coronary heart disease in ex-smokers before they stopped smoking: comparison with persistent smokers and nonsmokers. , 1979, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  W A Hunt,et al.  An evaluation of current methods of modifying smoking behavior. , 1974, Journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  W. Velicer,et al.  Interactive versus noninteractive interventions and dose-response relationships for stage-matched smoking cessation programs in a managed care setting. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  T. Vogt,et al.  The multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT). V. Intervention on smoking. , 1981, Preventive medicine.

[6]  M. Shipley,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice: 10-year results. , 1982, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  W A Hunt,et al.  Relapse rates in addiction programs. , 1971, Journal of clinical psychology.

[8]  W F Velicer,et al.  Evaluating a population-based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation. , 2001, Addictive behaviors.

[9]  P J Hamilton,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of the effect on middle-aged men of advice to stop smoking. , 1978, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[10]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[11]  K. Cummings,et al.  Debunking myths about self-quitting. Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[12]  Robyn L Richmond,et al.  Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[13]  W F Velicer,et al.  Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  W F Velicer,et al.  Counselor and stimulus control enhancements of a stage-matched expert system intervention for smokers in a managed care setting. , 2001, Preventive medicine.