Platform-based product design and environmental turbulence

Purpose – When competing in a turbulent environment, strategic flexibility can be a competitive advantage. One source of flexibility is the new product development (NPD) process, or more specifically product design. The purpose of this paper is to investigate platform-based product design and its relationship to environmental turbulence, strategic flexibility, and market performance. Design/methodology/approach – A theoretical model is developed and relationships are empirically tested using structural equation modeling. Data were collected from engineering design managers in the US manufacturing industry. Findings – The paper found that the higher the level of environmental turbulence the more firms turned to platform product design. Also, the higher the level of platform design the higher the level of market performance, both in the short term and the long term. Finally, the paper showed that strategic flexibility positively and partially mediates the positive relationship between platform design and pe...

[1]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Product platform and product family design : methods and applications , 2010 .

[2]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—II , 2004 .

[3]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: the moderating effects of uncertainty , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: the effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy , 2002 .

[5]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  PRODUCT FAMILY AND PLATFORM PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[6]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[7]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[8]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[9]  Kjell Grønhaug,et al.  Uncertainty, flexibility, and sustained competitive advantage , 2004 .

[10]  S. Kotha.  Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[11]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[12]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  Exploring Robust Design Capabilities, Their Role in Creating Global Products, and Their Relationship to Firm Performance , 2005 .

[13]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Success: Is It Really Controllable by Managers in Highly Turbulent Environments? , 2008 .

[14]  N. Acur,et al.  Examining Proactive Strategic Decision-Making Flexibility in New Product Development , 2012 .

[15]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Exploring the Relationships between Product Development and Environmental Turbulence: The Case of Mobile TLC Services , 2009 .

[16]  Daniel Baier,et al.  Deciding on new products using a computer-assisted real options approach , 2007 .

[17]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[18]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Developing product platforms:: analysis of the development process , 2000 .

[19]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Adapting real options to new product development by modeling the second Toyota paradox , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  An Adaptive Process Model to Support Product Development Project Management , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Development and Application of a Process-oriented "Thermometer" of IT Business Value , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Michael Song,et al.  Understanding Competencies in Platform-Based Product Development: Antecedents and Outcomes* , 2012 .

[24]  Daniel Bowman.  Effective Product Platform Planning in the Front End , 2006 .

[25]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Make Platform Innovation Drive Enterprise Growth , 2001 .

[26]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[27]  Teck-Yong Eng,et al.  Product variety strategy for improving new product development proficiencies , 2005 .

[28]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[29]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[30]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Leveraged high-variety strategies: From portfolio thinking to platform thinking , 1998 .

[31]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[32]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[33]  E. E. Scheuing.  New Product Management , 1974 .

[34]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed , 2007 .

[35]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[36]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[37]  R. Verganti,et al.  Adoption of NPD flexibility practices in new technology‐based firms , 2010 .

[38]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The relationship among modularity, functional coordination, and mass customization: Implications for competitiveness , 2010 .

[39]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2001 .

[40]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Life-Cycle Flexibility: How to measure and improve the innovative capability in turbulent environments , 2006 .

[41]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[42]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[43]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Introducing a platform strategy in product development , 1999 .

[44]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Design and Development of Information Products , 1996 .

[45]  Ludwig Bstieler,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on New Product Development and Time Efficiency , 2005 .

[46]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Activities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Hostility , 1997 .

[47]  S. Thomke,et al.  Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments , 1998 .

[48]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[49]  Gerda Gemser,et al.  Organizing innovation projects under technological turbulence , 2013 .

[50]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Platform-Based Product Family Development , 2006 .

[52]  Maximilian Pasche,et al.  Effects of platforms on new product development projects , 2011 .

[53]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic flexibility:Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions , 2004 .

[54]  Anar Helgi Kristjansson,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Platforms in Product Developing Organizations , 2004 .

[55]  A. Griffin,et al.  Consequences of New Product Development Speed: A Meta‐Analysis , 2013 .

[56]  F. Peter Boer,et al.  The Real Options Solution: Finding Total Value in a High-Risk World , 2002 .