Core Metadata Element Recommendations for Institutional Repositories at Texas A&M University Libraries
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Laura Costello. Title, Description, and Subject are the Most Important Metadata Fields for Keyword Discoverability , 2016 .
[2] Mehdi Safari,et al. Search Engines and Resource Discovery on the Web: Is Dublin Core an Impact Factor? , 2005, Webology.
[3] Jennifer M. Eustis. The Functions of (Meta)Data: Lessons Learned with a Fedora Digital Repository , 2013 .
[4] Marshall Breeding. Chapter 1: Measuring in a Virtual Environment , 2009 .
[5] Thomas P. Turner,et al. Rising to the Top: Evaluating the Use of the HTML META Tag To Improve Retrieval of World Wide Web Documents through Internet Search Engines. , 1998 .
[6] Allison V. Level,et al. Developing a Metadata Best Practices Model: The Experience of the Colorado State University Libraries , 2009 .
[7] Jin Zhang,et al. Internet Search Engines’ Response to Metadata Dublin Core Implementation , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..
[8] Brad Eden. Metadata and Its Application , 2002 .
[9] ZhangJin,et al. The impact of metadata implementation on webpage visibility in search engine results (part II) , 2005 .
[10] Kathleen Burnett,et al. A Comparison of the Two Traditions of Metadata Development , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[11] Ann Windnagel. The Usage of Simple Dublin Core Metadata in Digital Math and Science Repositories , 2014 .
[12] Mary Kurtz. Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories , 2010 .
[13] Le Yang. Metadata Effectiveness in Internet Discovery: An Analysis of Digital Collection Metadata Elements and Internet Search Engine Keywords , 2016, Coll. Res. Libr..
[14] Edward J. Valauskas,et al. Metadata as a Catalyst: Experiments with Metadata and Search Engines in the Internet Journal, First Monday , 2001 .