World Knowledge in Computational Models of Discourse Comprehension

Because higher level cognitive processes generally involve the use of world knowledge, computational models of these processes require the implementation of a knowledge base. This article identifies and discusses 4 strategies for dealing with world knowledge in computational models: disregarding world knowledge, ad hoc selection, extraction from text corpora, and implementation of all knowledge about a simplified microworld. Each of these strategies is illustrated by a detailed discussion of a model of discourse comprehension. It is argued that seemingly successful modeling results are uninformative if knowledge is implemented ad hoc or not at all, that knowledge extracted from large text corpora is not appropriate for discourse comprehension, and that a suitable implementation can be obtained by applying the microworld strategy.

[1]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[2]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[3]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  The effect of prior knowledge on understanding from text: Evidence from primed recognition , 2002 .

[4]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The Measurement of Textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. , 1998 .

[5]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse , 1998 .

[6]  Willem F. G. Haselager,et al.  Robust semantic systematicity and distributed representations in a connectionist model of sentence comprehension , 2006 .

[7]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis ☆ , 1990 .

[8]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Mental Models for Brand Placement , 2003 .

[9]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. , 1999 .

[10]  Stephanie M. Doane,et al.  ADAPT: A Predictive Cognitive Model of User Visual Attention and Action Planning , 2000, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[11]  Murray Singer,et al.  Comprehending consistent and inconsistent causal text sequences: A construction‐integration analysis , 1996 .

[12]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  A Unified Model for Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2002 .

[14]  E. J. O'Brien.  Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Comprehension-based skill acquisition , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Failures to Detect Contradictions in a Text: What Readers Believe versus what they Read , 1992 .

[17]  Mathieu Koppen,et al.  Predicting without modeling: a critique of Trabasso and Bartolone (2003). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Mathieu Koppen,et al.  Coherence-driven resolution of referential ambiguity: A computational model , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[19]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  ACTIVATION AND SUPPRESSION OF ANTECEDENTS DURING REINSTATEMENT , 1995 .

[20]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Predication , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. , 1991 .

[22]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Natural Language Processing With Modular PDP Networks and Distributed Lexicon , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  W. Kintsch.  Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  A Connectionist Extension to Kintsch's Construction–Integration Model , 2006 .

[25]  Guy Denhière,et al.  The interaction between textual structures and prior knowledge: Hypotheses, data and simulations , 2001 .

[26]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[27]  Richard M. Golden,et al.  A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall , 1993 .

[28]  S. Duffy,et al.  Degree of causal relatedness and memory , 1987 .

[29]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  The control of knowledge activation in discourse comprehension. , 2000 .

[30]  Mark F. St. John,et al.  The Story Gestalt: A Model of Knowledge-Intensive Processes in Text Comprehension , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines Between Entertainment and Persuasion , 2003 .

[32]  David Luna,et al.  Integrating Ad Information: A Text-Processing Perspective , 2005 .

[33]  W. Kintsch.  How readers construct situation models for stories. The role of suntactic cues and causal inferences , 1992 .

[34]  Muneo Kitajima,et al.  A comprehension-based model of correct performance and errors in skilled, display-based, human-computer interaction , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models and aging. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[36]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Metaphor Comprehension: What Makes a Metaphor Difficult to Understand? , 2002 .

[37]  M. V. Velzen,et al.  Self-organizing maps , 2007 .

[38]  Tracy Linderholm,et al.  Fluctuations in the Availability of Information During Reading: Capturing Cognitive Processes Using the Landscape Model , 2004, Discourse Processes.

[39]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Routine Computing Tasks: Planning as Understanding , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. , 1999 .

[41]  Sabine Guéraud,et al.  What Have We Been Missing? The Role of General World Knowledge in Discourse Processing , 2005 .

[42]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Mathieu Koppen,et al.  Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  Murray Singer,et al.  Constructing and Validating Motive Bridging Inferences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[46]  E J O'Brien,et al.  Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  P. Broek,et al.  The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. , 1999 .