A unifying approach for evaluating the condition of wetland plant communities and identifying related stressors.

Assessment of vegetation is an important part of evaluating wetland condition, but it is complicated by the variety of plant communities that are naturally present in freshwater wetlands. We present an approach to evaluate wetland condition consisting of: (1) a stratified random sample representing the entire range of anthropogenic stress, (2) field data representing a range of water depths within the wetlands sampled, (3) nonmetric multidimensional scaling (MDS) to determine a biological condition gradient across the wetlands sampled, (4) hierarchical clustering to interpret the condition results relative to recognizable plant communities, (5) classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to relate biological condition to natural and anthropogenic environmental drivers, and (6) mapping the results to display their geographic distribution. We applied this approach to plant species data collected at 90 wetlands of the U.S. Great Lakes coast that support a variety of plant communities, reflecting the diverse physical environment and anthropogenic stressors present within the region. Hierarchical cluster analysis yielded eight plant communities at a minimum similarity of 25%. Wetlands that clustered botanically were often geographically clustered as well, even though location was not an input variable in the analysis. The eight vegetation clusters corresponded well with the MDS configuration of the data, in which the first axis was strongly related (R2 = 0.787, P < 0.001) with floristic quality index (FQI) and the second axis was related to the Great Lake of occurrence. CART models using FQI and the first MDS axis as the response variables explained 75% and 82% of the variance in the data, resulting in 6-7 terminal groups spanning the condition gradient. Initial CART splits divided the region based on growing degree-days and cumulative anthropogenic stress; only after making these broad divisions were wetlands distinguished by more local characteristics. Agricultural and urban development variables were important correlates of wetland biological condition, generating optimal or surrogate splits at every split node of the MDS CART model. Our findings provide a means of using vegetation to evaluate a range of wetland condition across a broad and diverse geographic region.

[1]  C. Johnston.  Shrub species as indicators of wetland sedimentation , 2003, Wetlands.

[2]  C. Plante,et al.  Historical changes in herbaceous wetland distribution induced by hydrological conditions in Lake Saint-Pierre (St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada) , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  J. Zedler.  Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale , 2003 .

[4]  D. Albert,et al.  Rapid Plant Community Response to a Water Level Peak in Northern Lake Huron Coastal Wetlands , 2005 .

[5]  C. Johnston,et al.  Identifying and Characterizing Dominant Plants as an Indicator of Community Condition , 2007 .

[6]  Gerald J Niemi,et al.  Environmentally stratified sampling design for the development of Great Lakes environmental indicators , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[7]  C. Johnston,et al.  Partitioning vegetation response to anthropogenic stress to develop multi-taxa wetland indicators. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  J. K. Cronk,et al.  Wetland Plants: Biology and Ecology , 2001 .

[9]  P. Chow-Fraser,et al.  Synergistic impact of water level fluctuation and invasion of Glyceria on Typha in a freshwater marsh of Lake Ontario , 2006 .

[10]  M. Black,et al.  Hydrologic variability and the application of Index of Biotic Integrity metrics to wetlands: A great lakes evaluation , 2002, Wetlands.

[11]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  The effects of adjacent land use on wetland species richness and community composition , 2006, Wetlands.

[12]  P. G. Murphy,et al.  Long-term Ecological Consequences of Anthropogenic Disturbance on Saginaw Bay Coastal Wet Meadow Vegetation , 2005 .

[13]  David L. Johnson,et al.  Application of a Vegetation-Based Index of Biotic Integrity for Lake Erie coastal marshes in Ohio , 2008 .

[14]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[15]  Water Quality in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands: Basin-wide Patterns and Responses to an Anthropogenic Disturbance Gradient , 2007 .

[16]  K. Schulz,et al.  ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES A WORKING CLASSIFICATION OF U . S . TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS � � � � � , 2003 .

[17]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[18]  R. Lopez,et al.  TESTING THE FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT INDEX AS AN INDICATOR OF WETLAND CONDITION , 2002 .

[19]  T. Thompson,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic factors and ecosystem responses in coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes , 1999, Wetlands.

[20]  J. Grace,et al.  Vegetation associations in a rare community type – coastal tallgrass prairie , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[21]  P. Templer,et al.  Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem , 1998, Wetlands.

[22]  Todd A. Thompson,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands , 2005 .

[23]  C. Johnston,et al.  Rapid Invasion of a Great Lakes Coastal Wetland by Non-native Phragmites australis and Typha , 2007 .

[24]  C. Johnston,et al.  Properties and performance of the Floristic Quality Index in Great Lakes coastal wetlands , 2006, Wetlands.

[25]  P. Keddy,et al.  Competitive Performance and Species Distribution in Shortline Plant Communities: A Comparative Approach , 1995 .

[26]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[27]  Brian J. Palik,et al.  USING AN ECOLOGICAL LAND HIERARCHY TO PREDICT SEASONAL-WETLAND ABUNDANCE IN UPLAND FORESTS , 2003 .

[28]  László Orlóci,et al.  Applying Metric and Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling to Ecological Studies: Some New Results , 1986 .

[29]  S. Graham,et al.  Ecological indicators of nutrient enrichment, freshwater wetlands, Midwestern United States (U.S.) , 2007 .

[30]  Maureen M. Toner,et al.  Vegetation of Upper Coastal Plain depression wetlands: Environmental templates and wetland dynamics within a landscape framework , 2004, Wetlands.

[31]  D. Albert,et al.  Plants as regional indicators of Great Lakes coastal wetland health , 2004 .

[32]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Spatial Dependency of Vegetation–Environment Linkages in an Anthropogenically Influenced Wetland Ecosystem , 2004, Ecosystems.

[33]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[34]  P. Charles Goebel,et al.  Depressional wetland vegetation types: A question of plant community development , 2000, Wetlands.

[35]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Using non-linear responses of multiple taxonomic groups to establish criteria indicative of wetland biological condition , 2007, Wetlands.

[36]  JoAnn M. Hanowski,et al.  Evaluation of geographic, geomorphic and human influences on Great Lakes wetland indicators: A multi-assemblage approach , 2007 .

[37]  William V. Deluca,et al.  Threshold effects of coastal urbanization onPhragmites australis (common reed) abundance and foliar nitrogen in Chesapeake Bay , 2007 .

[38]  Susan K. Jackson,et al.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[39]  P. Chow-Fraser,et al.  Primary determinants of macrophyte community structure in 62 marshes across the Great Lakes basin: latitude, land use, and water quality effects , 2001 .

[40]  J. Zedler,et al.  Vegetation Change in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands: Deviation from the Historical Cycle , 2007 .

[41]  Bradley M. Herrick,et al.  Invasive Plant Species in Diked vs. Undiked Great Lakes Wetlands , 2005 .

[42]  Nicholas P. Danz,et al.  Environmental Indicators for the Coastal Region of the North American Great Lakes: Introduction and Prospectus , 2007 .

[43]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[44]  JoAnn M. Hanowski,et al.  Responsiveness of Great Lakes Wetland Indicators to Human Disturbances at Multiple Spatial Scales: A Multi-Assemblage Assessment , 2007 .

[45]  Mark M. Brinson,et al.  The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation , 1996 .

[46]  Nicholas P. Danz,et al.  Human Influences on Water Quality in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands , 2008, Environmental management.

[47]  C. Hudon,et al.  Modeling Wetland Plant Community Response to Assess Water-Level Regulation Scenarios in the Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Basin , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[48]  M. Brinson.  A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands , 1993 .

[49]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Land Use Land Cover Change in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin 1992 to 2001 , 2006 .

[50]  Jeffery C. Nekola.  Vascular plant compositional gradients within and between Iowa fens , 2004 .

[51]  S. Esterby.  American Society for Testing and Materials , 2006 .

[52]  C. Johnston,et al.  Plant Species Indicators of Physical Environment in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands , 2007 .

[53]  S. Bayley,et al.  Vegetation patterns and biodiversity of peatland plant communities surrounding mid-boreal wetland ponds in Alberta, Canada , 2005 .

[54]  Patricia Chow-Fraser,et al.  Ecosystem response to changes in water level of Lake Ontario marshes: lessons from the restoration of Cootes Paradise Marsh , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[55]  P. Keddy,et al.  Great Lakes Vegetation Dynamics: The Role of Fluctuating Water Levels and Buried Seeds , 1986 .

[56]  T. Hollenhorst,et al.  Methods for Generating Multi-scale Watershed Delineations for Indicator Development in Great Lake Coastal Ecosystems , 2007 .

[57]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[58]  S. Fennessy.  Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Using Vegetation To Assess Environmental Conditions in Wetlands , 2002 .

[59]  P. Kelsey,et al.  Relationships among environmental factors, vegetation zones, and species richness in a North American calcareous prairie fen , 2005, Wetlands.

[60]  Maureen M. Toner,et al.  RIVER HYDROLOGY AND RIPARIAN WETLANDS: A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR ECOLOGICAL ASSEMBLY , 1997 .

[61]  Gerald J Niemi,et al.  Integrated Measures of Anthropogenic Stress in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin , 2007, Environmental management.

[62]  Debra L. Taylor,et al.  Exotic and Invasive Aquatic Plants in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands: Distribution and Relation to Watershed Land Use and Plant Richness and Cover , 2007 .