Vectorcardiographic monitoring of patients with acute myocardial infarction and chronic bundle branch block.

AIMS This study was set up to describe vectorcardiographic patterns in patients with bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-five patients admitted to the coronary care unit with bundle-branch block and suspected acute myocardial infarction were monitored by dynamic vectorcardiography with trend analysis. In 28 patients, a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made. In patients with left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction, the pattern of QRS vector-difference evolution was similar to that in patients with the narrow QRS complex, while ST vector-magnitude changes increased over time. Using a cut-off value for QRS vector-difference at 12 h of more than 20 microVs and a specific trend curve pattern, acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block could be diagnosed with an accuracy of 71%. For patients with right bundle branch block, using a maximum ST vector-magnitude of > 200 microV during the first 4 h, acute myocardial infarction could be diagnosed with a 78% accuracy. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that dynamic vectorcardiography is a valuable tool in diagnosing and monitoring acute myocardial infarction in patients with bundle branch block.

[1]  P. Grøttum,et al.  Real-time serial analysis of infarctional changes in the vectorcardiogram. , 1985, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[2]  P. Stein,et al.  Vectorcardiographic and electrocardiographic diagnosis of diaphragmatic myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. , 1979, Japanese circulation journal.

[3]  M. Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of QRST time-integral values of 12-lead electrocardiograms in diagnosing healed myocardial infarction complicated by left bundle branch block. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  C. Sylvén,et al.  Relation between ST and QRS vector changes and myoglobin release in acute myocardial infarction. , 1983, Cardiovascular research.

[5]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Dynamic QRS complex and ST segment vectorcardiographic monitoring can identify vessel patency in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion therapy. , 1991, American heart journal.

[6]  P. Denes,et al.  Evaluation of criteria for diagnosis of myocardial infarction: study of 256 patients with intermittent left bundle branch block. , 1979, Chest.

[7]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico..  MEDICAL SCIENCE GISSI-2: A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12 490 patients with acute myocardial infarction , 1990, The Lancet.

[8]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Dynamic QRS and ST-segment changes in myocardial infarction monitored by continuous on-line vectorcardiography. , 1990, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  P. Grøttum,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial ischemia and necrosis by continuous vectorcardiography and measurement of creatine kinase release in patients. , 1983, Circulation.

[10]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the exercise electrocardiogram in patients with preexisting right bundle branch block. , 1994, American heart journal.

[11]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Dynamic QRS-complex and ST-segment monitoring in acute myocardial infarction during recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy. The TEAHAT Study Group. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Ernestfrank.  An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956 .

[13]  P. Grøttum,et al.  Evolution of vectorcardiographic QRS changes during myocardial infarction in dogs and their relation to infarct size. , 1986, Cardiovascular research.

[14]  M. Krucoff,et al.  Quantification of ST-segment changes during coronary angioplasty in patients with left bundle branch block. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  P. Grøttum,et al.  Course of chest pain and its relation to CK release and ST/QRS vector changes in patients with acute myocardial infarction randomized to treatment with intravenous timolol or placebo. , 1985, American heart journal.

[16]  L. T. Sheffield,et al.  Bundle branch block in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: angiographic correlates and prognostic significance. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  M. Rubenfire,et al.  The Clinical Significance of Bundle Branch Block Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1978, Circulation.

[18]  R. Weiner,et al.  Identification of myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block: Correlation of electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, and angiography , 1983, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[19]  N. Flowers.  Left bundle branch block: a continuously evolving concept. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  F. Wackers,et al.  Complete left bundle branch block: is the diagnosis of myocardial infarction possible? , 1983, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  A. Hutter,et al.  The significance of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarction. , 1975, American heart journal.

[22]  M. LEE PEARCE,et al.  Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle‐Branch Block , 1957, Circulation.

[23]  L. Horan,et al.  The Pathologic Correlates of the Electrocardiogram: Complete Left Bundle Branch Block , 1982, Circulation.

[24]  L. Erhardt,et al.  Continuous vectorcardiography in acute myocardial infarction. Natural course of ST and QRS vectors. , 1983, International journal of cardiology.

[25]  W. Kannel,et al.  Comparative Features of Newly Acquired Left and Right Bundle Branch Block in the General Population: The Framingham Study , 1982 .

[26]  Sven Eriksson,et al.  Continuous vectorcardiography in patients with chest pain indicative of acute ischemic heart disease. , 1992, Cardiology.

[27]  L. Horan,et al.  The Significance of Diagnostic Q Waves in the Presence of Bundle Branch Block , 1970 .

[28]  W. Dressler,et al.  The electrocardiographic signs of myocardial infarction in the presence of bundle branch block; myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block. , 1950, American heart journal.

[29]  E. Cook,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of complete left bundle branch block. , 1988, American heart journal.

[30]  J. Brugada,et al.  Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  M. Besoaín-Santander,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in cases of complete left bundle branch block , 1960 .

[32]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Dynamic changes of the QRS complex in unstable angina pectoris. , 1992, International journal of cardiology.

[33]  M. Hirai,et al.  Effects of simulated left bundle branch block on QRST time-integral values of 12-lead electrocardiograms in patients with and without prior anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.