Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre

Aims As digital pathology (DP) and whole slide imaging (WSI) technology advance and mature, there is an increasing drive to incorporate DP into the diagnostic environment. However, integration of DP into the diagnostic laboratory is a non-trivial task and filled with unexpected challenges unlike standalone implementations. We share our journey of implementing DP in the diagnostic laboratory setting, highlighting seven key guiding principles that drive the progression through implementation into deployment and beyond. Methods The DP implementation with laboratory information system integration was completed in 8 months, including validation of the solution for diagnostic use in accordance with College of American Pathologists guidelines. We also conducted prospective validation via paired delivery of glass slides and WSI to our pathologists postdeployment. Results Common themes in our guiding principles included emphasis on workflow and being comprehensive in the approach, looking beyond pathologist user champions and expanding into an extended project team involving laboratory technicians, clerical/data room staff and archival staff. Concordance between glass slides and WSI ranged from 93% to 100% among various applications on validation. We also provided equal opportunities for every pathologist throughout the department to be competent and confident with DP through prospective validation, with overall concordance of 96% compared with glass slides, allowing appreciation of the advantages and limitations of WSI, hence enabling the use of DP as a useful diagnostic modality. Conclusions Smooth integration of DP into the diagnostic laboratory is possible with careful planning, discipline and a systematic approach adhering to our guiding principles.

[1]  A. Jara-Lazaro,et al.  Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice , 2010, Pathology.

[2]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Can Digital Pathology Result In Cost Savings? A Financial Projection For Digital Pathology Implementation At A Large Integrated Health Care Organization , 2014, Journal of pathology informatics.

[3]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  Jesse K. McKenney,et al.  Validation of whole slide imaging for frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology , 2015, Journal of pathology informatics.

[5]  R. Langer,et al.  Image analysis of immunohistochemistry is superior to visual scoring as shown for patient outcome of esophageal adenocarcinoma , 2014, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[6]  Yee-Wah Tsang,et al.  Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis , 2016, Histopathology.

[7]  Andrew Evans,et al.  Virtual microscopy using whole-slide imaging as an enabler for teledermatopathology: A paired consultant validation study , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[8]  Bernard Têtu,et al.  Canadian licensure for the use of digital pathology for routine diagnoses: one more step toward a new era of pathology practice without borders. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  A. Jara-Lazaro,et al.  Comparing digital and optical microscopy diagnoses of breast and prostate core biopsies. , 2012, Pathology.