No actual measurement … was required: Maxwell and Cavendish's null method for the inverse square law of electrostatics.

In 1877 James Clerk Maxwell and his student Donald MacAlister refined Henry Cavendish's 1773 null experiment demonstrating the absence of electricity inside a charged conductor. This null result was a mathematical prediction of the inverse square law of electrostatics, and both Cavendish and Maxwell took the experiment as verifying the law. However, Maxwell had already expressed absolute conviction in the law, based on results of Michael Faraday's. So, what was the value to him of repeating Cavendish's experiment? After assessing whether the law was as secure as he claimed, this paper explores its central importance to the electrical programme that Maxwell was pursuing. It traces the historical and conceptual re-orderings through which Maxwell established the law by constructing a tradition of null tests and asserting the superior accuracy of the method. Maxwell drew on his developing 'doctrine of method' to identify Cavendish's experiment as a member of a wider class of null methods. By doing so, he appealed to the null practices of telegraph engineers, diverted attention from the flawed logic of the method, and sought to localise issues around the mapping of numbers onto instrumental indications, on the grounds that 'no actual measurement … was required'.

[1]  Jordi Cat,et al.  On Understanding: Maxwell on the Methods of Illustration and Scientific Metaphor , 2001 .

[2]  James Clerk Maxwell.  An Elementary Treatise on Electricity , 1888 .

[3]  R. Haüy.  Traité élémentaire de physique , 1803 .

[4]  J. D. Everett,et al.  Elementary Treatise on Natural Philosophy , 2022, Nature.

[5]  Crosbie Smith.  The Science of Energy: A Cultural History of Energy Physics in Victorian Britain , 1998 .

[6]  A. Ganot.  Elementary Treatise on Physics, Experimental and Applied , 1863, The British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review.

[7]  Daniel Jon Mitchell.  Making sense of absolute measurement: James Clerk Maxwell, William Thomson, Fleeming Jenkin, and the invention of the dimensional formula , 2017 .

[8]  XIV. On some elementary laws of electricity , 1834, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[9]  Henry Cavendish's deduction of the electrostatic inverse square law from the result of a single experiment , 1974 .

[10]  Bruce J. Hunt,et al.  The Ohm Is Where the Art Is: British Telegraph Engineers and the Development of Electrical Standards , 1994, Osiris.

[11]  A. Bain.  The senses and the intellect , 1998 .

[12]  James Clerk Maxwell,et al.  The Scientific Letters and Papers of James Clerk Maxwell: Volume 1, 1846-1862 , 1990 .

[13]  C. Wheatstone.  XIII. The Bakerian lecture.—An account of several new instruments and processes for determining the constants of a voltaic circuit , 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[14]  D. F. Bartlett,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF COULOMB'S LAW. , 1970 .

[15]  G. Green.  An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism , 2008, 0807.0088.

[16]  I. Morus.  Currents from the Underworld: Electricity and the Technology of Display in Early Victorian England , 1993, Isis.

[17]  Josep Simon.  Communicating Physics: The Production, Circulation, and Appropriation of Ganot's Textbooks in France and England, 1851–1887 , 2011 .

[18]  John L. Heilbron,et al.  The Rise of Experimental Physics. (Book Reviews: Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries. A Study of Early Modern Physics) , 1980 .

[19]  D. Cahan.  From dust figures to the kinetic theory of gases: August kundt and the changing nature of experimental physics in the 1860s and 1870s , 1990 .

[20]  Marcel Boumans,et al.  Measurement Outside the Laboratory , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[21]  Christine Blondel,et al.  Electrical instruments in 19th century France, between makers and users , 1997 .

[22]  Simon Schaffer,et al.  Late Victorian metrology and its instrumentation: a manufactory of Ohms , 1992, Other Conferences.

[23]  Hasok Chang.  Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism1 , 2007, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement.

[24]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books , 2010, Science.

[25]  William Snow Harris.  XIV. The Bakerian Lecture.—inquiries concerning the elementary laws of electricity.—third series , 1839, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[26]  B. J. Hunt.  Maxwell, Measurement, and the Modes of Electromagnetic Theory , 2015 .

[27]  Faraday Michael.  XXXII. On static electrical inductive action , 1843 .

[28]  Hans Radder,et al.  Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenters' Regress , 1992, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[29]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Counting and measuring , 2022 .

[30]  J. Faller,et al.  New Experimental Test of Coulomb's Law: A Laboratory Upper Limit on the Photon Rest Mass , 1971 .

[31]  James Clerk Maxwell,et al.  Electrical Researches of Henry Cavendish: AN ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN SOME OF THE PRINCIPAL PHÆNOMENA OF ELECTRICITY, BY MEANS OF AN ELASTIC FLUID , 2010 .

[32]  Olivier Darrigol,et al.  Number and measure: Hermann von Helmholtz at the crossroads of mathematics, physics, and psychology. , 2003, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[33]  Michael Faraday.  I. Experimental researches in electricity. — eleventh series , 1838, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[34]  Ronald Laymon,et al.  Demonstrative induction, old and new evidence and the accuracy of the electrostatic inverse square law , 1994, Synthese.

[35]  Alberto A. Martínez.  Replication of Coulomb's Torsion Balance Experiment , 2006 .

[36]  G. Gooday.  Precision measurement and the genesis of physics teaching laboratories in Victorian Britain , 1990, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[37]  W. Snow Harris.  XX. Inquiries coneerning the elementary laws of electricity. Second series , 1836, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[38]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.

[39]  P. Heering.  On Coulomb’s inverse square law , 1992 .

[40]  Ido Yavetz.  Oliver Heaviside and the significance of the British electrical debate , 1993 .

[41]  M. Suárez,et al.  The Values of Precision , 2020 .

[42]  J. Maxwell.  A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , 1873, Nature.

[43]  G. Gooday.  The Morals of Measurement: Accuracy, Irony, and Trust in Late Victorian Electrical Practice , 2004 .

[44]  M. Norton Wise,et al.  Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin by Crosbie Smith, M. Norton Wise (review) , 1991, Technology and Culture.

[45]  James Clerk Maxwell,et al.  Introductory Lecture on Experimental Physics , 2011 .

[46]  Robert Murphy.  Elementary principles of the theories of electricity, heat, and molecular actions : designed for the use of students in the University , 1833 .

[47]  J. Dorling.  Demonstrative Induction: Its Significant Role in the History of Physics , 1973, Philosophy of Science.