A strategy capitalizing on synergies: the Reporting Structure for Biological Investigation (RSBI) working group.

In this article we present the Reporting Structure for Biological Investigation (RSBI), a working group under the Microarray Gene Expression Data (MGED) Society umbrella. RSBI brings together several communities to tackle the challenges associated with integrating data and representing complex biological investigations, employing multiple OMICS technologies. Currently, RSBI includes environmental genomics, nutrigenomics and toxicogenomics communities, where independent activities are underway to develop databases and establish data communication standards within their respective domains. The RSBI working group has been conceived as a "single point of focus" for these communities, conforming to general accepted view that duplication and incompatibility should be avoided where possible. This endeavour has aimed to synergize insular solutions into one common terminology between biologically driven standardisation efforts and has also resulted in strong collaborations and shared understanding between those in the technological domain. Through extensive liaisons with many standards efforts, several threads have been woven with the hope that ultimately technology-centered standards and their specific extensions into biological domains of interest will not only stand alone, but will also be able to function together, as interchangeable modules.

[1]  Leo L. Cheng,et al.  Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: mammalian/in vivo experiments , 2007, Metabolomics.

[2]  Alvis Brazma,et al.  MGED standards: work in progress. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[3]  Susanna-Assunta Sansone,et al.  Defining best practice for microarray analyses in nutrigenomic studies. , 2005, The British journal of nutrition.

[4]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Establishing reporting standards for metabolomic and metabonomic studies: a call for participation. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[5]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Data standards for 'omic' science , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Dawn Field,et al.  Meeting report: eGenomics: Cataloguing our Complete Genome Collection II. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[8]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Ronald C. Taylor,et al.  Development of the Minimum Information Specification for In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry Experiments (MISFISHIE). , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[10]  Michael D Waters,et al.  Database development in toxicogenomics: issues and efforts. , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[12]  N. Morrison,et al.  Chemical effects in biological systems--data dictionary (CEBS-DD): a compendium of terms for the capture and integration of biological study design description, conventional phenotypes, and 'omics data. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Meeting Report: Validation of Toxicogenomics-Based Test Systems: ECVAM–ICCVAM/NICEATM Considerations for Regulatory Use , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  Metabolomics standards initiative: ontology working group work in progress , 2007, Metabolomics.

[15]  Norman Morrison,et al.  Standardization Initiatives in the (eco)toxicogenomics Domain: A Review , 2004, Comparative and functional genomics.

[16]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Andy Brass,et al.  Annotation of environmental OMICS data: application to the transcriptomics domain. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[18]  Graham McLaren,et al.  Generation Challenge Programme (GCP): standards for crop data. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[19]  Coecke Sandra,et al.  Validation of Toxicogenomics-Based Test Systems:ECVAM-ICCVAM/NICEATM Considerations for Regulatory Use , 2006 .

[20]  Susanna-Assunta Sansone,et al.  Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: environmental context , 2007, Metabolomics.

[21]  J. Blake Bio-ontologies—fast and furious , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Andrew R Jones,et al.  FuGE: Functional Genomics Experiment Object Model. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[23]  Josef Spidlen,et al.  Data standards for flow cytometry. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[24]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  The Functional Genomics Experiment model (FuGE): an extensible framework for standards in functional genomics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.