Study of edge detection task in dental panoramic radiographs.

The purpose of this study is (1) to introduce a new approach for edge detection in orthopantograms (OPGs) and an improved automatic parameter selector for common edge detectors, (2) to present a comparison between our novel approach with common edge detectors and (3) to provide faster outputs without compromising quality. A new approach for edge detection based on statistical measures was introduced: (1) a set of N edge detection results is calculated from a given input image and a selected type of edge detector, (2) N correspondence maps are constructed from N edge detection results, (3) probabilities and average probabilities are computed, (4) an overall correspondence is evaluated for each correspondence map and (5) the correspondence map providing the best overall correspondence is taken as the result of edge detection procedure. A comparison with common edge detectors (the Roberts, Prewitt, Sobel, Laplacian of the Gaussian and Canny methods) with various parameter settings (304 combinations for each test image) was carried out. The methods were assessed objectively [edge mismatch error (EME), modified Hausdorff distance (MHD) and principal component analysis] and subjectively by experts in dentistry and based on time demands. The suitability of the new approach for edge detection in OPGs was confirmed by experts. The current conventional methods in edge detection in OPGs are inadequate (none of the tested methods reach an EME value or MHD value below 0.1). Our proposed approach for edge detection shows promising potential for its implementation in clinical dentistry. It enhances the accuracy of OPG interpretation and advances diagnosis and treatment planning.

[1]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Odontoma-associated tooth impaction: accurate diagnosis with simple methods? Case report and literature review. , 2012, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  P. Stelt Better Imaging: The Advantages of Digital Radiography , 2008 .

[3]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Image Post-Processing in Dental Practice , 2009, European journal of dentistry.

[4]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  C. Bourauel,et al.  Evaluating miniscrew position using orthopantomograms compared to cone-beam computed tomography , 2012, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[6]  G. S. Robinson Edge detection by compass gradient masks , 1977 .

[7]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Jose López-López,et al.  Computer-aided system for morphometric mandibular index computation (Using dental panoramic radiographs) , 2012, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[9]  Yitzhak Yitzhaky,et al.  A Method for Objective Edge Detection Evaluation and Detector Parameter Selection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  William A. Yasnoff,et al.  Error measures for scene segmentation , 1977, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Helena Chmura Kraemer,et al.  Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines , 1992 .

[12]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  Automated measurement of mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[13]  K. Kamburoğlu,et al.  Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography. , 2012, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[14]  Rafael Muñoz-Salinas,et al.  A novel method to look for the hysteresis thresholds for the Canny edge detector , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Dental Biometrics: Alignment and Matching of Dental Radiographs , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Jim R. Parker,et al.  Algorithms for image processing and computer vision , 1996 .

[18]  R. Jacobs Dental cone beam CT and its justified use in oral health care. , 2011, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[19]  P. Burke,et al.  Angular Distortion in the Orthopantomogram , 1984, British journal of orthodontics.

[20]  Mohamed Abdel-Mottaleb,et al.  Fusion of Matching Algorithms for Human Identification Using Dental X-Ray Radiographs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[21]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  H Devlin,et al.  Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[23]  A. Asano,et al.  A computer-aided diagnosis system to screen for osteoporosis using dental panoramic radiographs. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[24]  Yitzhak Yitzhaky,et al.  Automatic selection of edge detector parameters based on spatial and statistical measures , 2006, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[25]  Atam P. Dhawan,et al.  Medical Image Analysis , 2003 .