Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia

Having the ability to control cell behaviour would be of great advantage in tissue engineering. One method of gaining control over cell adhesion, proliferation, guidance and differentiation is use of topography. Whilst it has be known for some time that cells can be guided by micro‐topography, it is only recently becoming clear that cells will respond strongly to nano‐scale topography. The fact that cells will take cues from their micro‐ and nano‐environment suggests that the cells are in some way ‘spatially aware’. It is likely that cells probe the shape of their surroundings using filopodia, and that this initial filopodia/topography interaction may be critical to down‐stream cell reactions to biomaterials, or indeed, the extracellular matrix. One intriguing question is how small a feature can cells sense? In order to investigate the limits of cell sensing, high‐resolution scanning electron microscopy has been used to simultaneously view cell filopodia and 10 nm high nano‐islands. Fluorescence microscopy has also been used to look at adhesion formation. The results showed distinct filopodial/nano‐island interaction and changes in adhesion morphology.

[1]  T. Springer,et al.  Interface properties of blends of incompatible polymers , 1994 .

[2]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Tumor Suppressor PTEN Mediates Sensing of Chemoattractant Gradients , 2002, Cell.

[3]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[4]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[5]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Optimizing HAPEX topography influences osteoblast response. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[6]  A. Bershadsky,et al.  Focal contacts of normal and RSV-transformed quail cells. Hypothesis of the transformation-induced deficient maturation of focal contacts. , 1985, Experimental cell research.

[7]  S. Britland,et al.  Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[8]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[9]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Increasing hydroxyapatite incorporation into poly(methylmethacrylate) cement increases osteoblast adhesion and response. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[10]  A Curtis,et al.  Synergistic and hierarchical adhesive and topographic guidance of BHK cells. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[11]  A. Koleske Do Filopodia Enable the Growth Cone to Find Its Way? , 2003, Science's STKE.

[12]  T. Gustafson,et al.  Studies on the cellular basis of morphogenesis in the sea urchin embryo. Directed movements of primary mesenchyme cells in normal and vegetalized larvae. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[13]  M. Stamm,et al.  Topography and Surface Composition of Thin Films of Blends of Polystyrene with Brominated Polystyrenes: Effects of Varying the Degree of Bromination and Annealing , 1998 .

[14]  T. A. Desai,et al.  Micro- and nanoscale structures for tissue engineering constructs. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[16]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Single-Molecule Analysis of Chemotactic Signaling in Dictyostelium Cells , 2001, Science.

[17]  A. Carrel,et al.  CULTIVATION IN VITRO OF MALIGNANT TUMORS , 1911, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al.  The effects of continuous and discontinuous groove edges on cell shape and alignment. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[19]  M. Stamm,et al.  The effect of molecular weight on the topography of thin films of blends of poly(4-bromostyrene) and polystyrene , 2000 .

[20]  Paul Martin,et al.  Structures in focus--filopodia. , 2002, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[21]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[22]  Richard A. Pethrick,et al.  Surface Topography and Composition of Deuterated Polystyrene-Poly(bromostyrene) Blends , 1996 .

[23]  C. McCaig,et al.  Guidance of CNS growth cones by substratum grooves and ridges: effects of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton, calcium channels and signal transduction pathways. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[24]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[25]  A Curtis,et al.  Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[26]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering : Frontiers in biotechnology , 1993 .

[27]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[28]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced osteoclast-like cell functions on nanophase ceramics. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[29]  G. E. Jones,et al.  The Rho GTPases in macrophage motility and chemotaxis. , 1998, Cell adhesion and communication.

[30]  G. Camussi,et al.  Endothelization and adherence of leucocytes to nanostructured surfaces. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[31]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Grooved substrata facilitate in vitro healing of completely divided flexor tendons , 1995 .

[32]  W. Korohoda,et al.  CONTACT GUIDANCE OF CHICK EMBRYO NEURONS ON SINGLE SCRATCHES IN GLASS AND ON UNDERLYING ALIGNED HUMAN SKIN FIBROBLASTS , 1999, Cell biology international.

[33]  W. Bonfield,et al.  In vitro mechanical and biological assessment of hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene composite , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[34]  Yves F. Dufrêne,et al.  Fabrication of nanostructured polymer surfaces using colloidal lithography and spin-coating , 2002 .