Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?

AIM To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI screen-detected lesions recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-six consecutive Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3-5 lesions with histopathological correlation [nine invasive cancers, 13 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 34 benign] were retrospectively evaluated using a breast MRI CAD prototype (CAD-Gaea). CAD evaluation was performed separately and in consensus by two radiologists specializing in breast imaging, blinded to the histopathology. Thresholds of 50, 80, and 100% and delayed enhancement were independently assessed with CAD. Lesions were rated as malignant or benign according to threshold and delayed enhancement only and in combination. Sensitivities, specificities, and negative predictive values (NPV) were determined for CAD assessments versus pathology. Initial MRI BI-RADS interpretation without CAD versus CAD assessments were compared using paired binary diagnostic tests. RESULTS Threshold levels for lesion enhancement were: 50% to include all malignant (and all benign) lesions; and 100% for all invasive cancer and high-grade DCIS. Combined use of threshold and enhancement patterns for CAD assessment was best (73% sensitivity, 56% specificity and 76% NPV for all cancer). Sensitivities and NPV were better for invasive cancer (100%/100%) than for all malignancies (54%/76%). Radiologists' MRI interpretation was more sensitive than CAD (p=0.05), but less specific (p=0.001) for cancer detection. CONCLUSION The breast MRI CAD system used could not improve the radiologists' accuracy for distinguishing all malignant from benign lesions, due to the poor sensitivity for DCIS detection.

[1]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  S. Edge,et al.  Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[7]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  Constance D. Lehman,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Breast MRI: Assessment of CAD-Generated Enhancement and Tumor Sizes in Breast Cancers Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy1 , 2005 .

[11]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[12]  C. Wood,et al.  Computer Aided Detection (CAD) for Breast MRI , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[13]  D B Plewes,et al.  Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  E. Morris.  Illustrated breast MR lexicon. , 2001, Seminars in roentgenology.

[17]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[18]  John D. McKenzie,et al.  Number Cruncher Statistical Systems (NCSS) , 1985 .

[19]  R. G. Stough.  Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions , 2008 .

[20]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Breast cancer imaging with MRI. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[21]  Anne L. Martel,et al.  Classification of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Breast Lesions by Support Vector Machines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Constance D Lehman,et al.  Computer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[23]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  P. Chappuis,et al.  Re: Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  S. Pinder,et al.  Breast imaging findings in women with BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinoma. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[26]  D Krebs,et al.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. , 2000, Radiology.

[27]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.

[28]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.