Development of a fully automatic scheme for detection of masses in whole breast ultrasound images.

Ultrasonography has been used for breast cancer screening in Japan. Screening using a conventional hand-held probe is operator dependent and thus it is possible that some areas of the breast may not be scanned. To overcome such problems, a mechanical whole breast ultrasound (US) scanner has been proposed and developed for screening purposes. However, another issue is that radiologists might tire while interpreting all images in a large-volume screening; this increases the likelihood that masses may remain undetected. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a fully automatic scheme for the detection of masses in whole breast US images in order to assist the interpretations of radiologists and potentially improve the screening accuracy. The authors database comprised 109 whole breast US imagoes, which include 36 masses (16 malignant masses, 5 fibroadenomas, and 15 cysts). A whole breast US image with 84 slice images (interval between two slice images: 2 mm) was obtained by the ASU-1004 US scanner (ALOKA Co., Ltd., Japan). The feature based on the edge directions in each slice and a method for subtracting between the slice images were used for the detection of masses in the authors proposed scheme. The Canny edge detector was applied to detect edges in US images; these edges were classified as near-vertical edges or near-horizontal edges using a morphological method. The positions of mass candidates were located using the near-vertical edges as a cue. Then, the located positions were segmented by the watershed algorithm and mass candidate regions were detected using the segmented regions and the low-density regions extracted by the slice subtraction method. For the removal of false positives (FPs), rule-based schemes and a quadratic discriminant analysis were applied for the distribution between masses and FPs. As a result, the sensitivity of the authors scheme for the detection of masses was 80.6% (29/36) with 3.8 FPs per whole breast image. The authors scheme for a computer-aided detection may be useful in improving the screening performance and efficiency.

[1]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  M. Giger,et al.  Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. , 2005, Radiology.

[5]  R. Ehrich.  A symmetric hysteresis smoothing algorithm that preserves principal features , 1978 .

[6]  F. Akiyama,et al.  diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years , 2007, Breast cancer.

[7]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Breast Density Analysis in 3-D Whole Breast Ultrasound Images , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Breast-cancer screening with ultrasonography , 1999, The Lancet.

[9]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Semi-automatic ultrasonic full-breast scanner and computer-assisted detection system for breast cancer mass screening , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  A. Russell Localio,et al.  Benefit of screening mammography in reducing the rate of late-stage breast cancer diagnoses (United States) , 2006, Cancer Causes & Control.

[14]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[15]  Dar-Ren Chen,et al.  Watershed segmentation for breast tumor in 2-D sonography. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[17]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[18]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Sheng-Fang Huang,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis for 2D/3D breast ultrasound , 2006 .

[20]  N. Duric,et al.  Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[21]  Olsi Rama,et al.  Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment. , 2005, Medical physics.

[22]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Detection, Characterization, and Visualization of Breast Cancer Using 3D Ultrasound Images , 2006 .

[23]  R. Ehrich,et al.  A view of texture topology and texture description , 1978 .

[24]  M S Soo,et al.  Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  Noriaki Ohuchi,et al.  The increase of female breast cancer incidence in Japan: Emergence of birth cohort effect , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[26]  Radhika Sivaramakrishna,et al.  Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images. , 2002, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[27]  Frank Shih,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Morphology , 2009 .

[28]  Chen-Ming Kuo,et al.  Image stitching and computer-aided diagnosis for whole breast ultrasound image , 2006 .

[29]  André Victor Alvarenga,et al.  Complexity curve and grey level co-occurrence matrix in the texture evaluation of breast tumor on ultrasound images. , 2007, Medical physics.

[30]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[31]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  T. Fukumura,et al.  An Analysis of Topological Properties of Digitized Binary Pictures Using Local Features , 1975 .

[33]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[34]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[35]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[36]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[37]  Hiroshi Morikubo.  Breast Cancer Screening by Palpation, Ultrasound, and Mammography , 2005 .

[38]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.

[39]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[40]  D P Chakraborty,et al.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data. , 1989, Medical physics.

[41]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Whole breast computer-aided screening using free-hand ultrasound , 2005 .