Stuck in the Middle

The classic goal-gradient hypothesis posits that motivation to reach a goal increases monotonically with proximity to the desired end state. However, we argue that this is not always the case. In this article, we show that motivation to engage in goal-consistent behavior can be higher when people are either far from or close to the end state and lower when they are about halfway to the end state. We propose a psychophysical explanation for this tendency to get “stuck in the middle.” Building on the assumption that motivation is influenced by the perceived marginal value of progress toward the goal, we show that the shape of the goal gradient varies depending on whether an individual monitors progress in terms of distance from the initial state or from the desired end state. Our psychophysical model of goal pursuit predicts a previously undiscovered nonmonotonic gradient, as well as two monotonic gradients.

[1]  Minjung Koo,et al.  Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  M. Smith.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .

[3]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort , 2006 .

[4]  J. Elster,et al.  Utility from memory and anticipation. , 1992 .

[5]  N. Liberman,et al.  Normal and pathological consequences of encountering difficulties in monitoring progress toward goals. , 2009 .

[6]  G. Loewenstein.  The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. , 1994 .

[7]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[8]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[9]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Regulating the Effects of Depletion Through Monitoring , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J. S. Brown.  A note on a temporal gradient of reinforcement. , 1939 .

[12]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relation to level of motivation. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  C. L. Hull.  The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. , 1932 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[16]  Shann Turnbull,et al.  Self-Regulation , 1997 .

[17]  K. Vohs,et al.  Self-regulation and the extended now: controlling the self alters the subjective experience of time. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  C. L. Hull.  The rat's speed-of-locomotion gradient in the approach to food. , 1934 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[20]  S. Epstein,et al.  Relative steepness of approach and avoidance gradients as a function of magnitude and valence of incentive. , 1977 .

[21]  Ran Kivetz,et al.  The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention , 2006 .

[22]  N. W. Smith.  GSR Measures of Cigarette Smokers’ Temporal Approach and Avoidance Gradients , 1965 .

[23]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[24]  J. Wipf.  POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE GRADIENTS OF RESPONSE STRENGTH IN A TEMPORAL CONFLICT SITUATION. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .

[26]  Approach and avoidance gradients and conflict behavior in a predominantly temporal situation. , 1954 .

[27]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[29]  N. Liberman,et al.  Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Minjung Koo,et al.  Climbing the Goal Ladder: How Upcoming Actions Increase Level of Aspiration Expressing Commitment versus Making Progress Remaining Actions Increase Level of Aspiration , 2022 .

[31]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.