Bias observed in time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements using radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam.

Measurement of shear wave propagation speed has important clinical applications because it is related to tissue stiffness and health state. Shear waves can be generated in tissues by the radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam (push beam). Shear wave speed can be measured by tracking its propagation laterally from the push beam focus using the time-of-flight principle. This study shows that shear wave speed measurements with such methods can be transducer, depth and lateral tracking range dependent. Three homogeneous phantoms with different stiffness were studied using curvilinear and linear array transducer. Shear wave speed measurements were made at different depths, using different aperture sizes for push and at different lateral distance ranges from the push beam. The curvilinear transducer shows a relatively large measurement bias that is depth dependent. The possible causes of the bias and options for correction are discussed. These bias errors must be taken into account to provide accurate and precise time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements for clinical use.

[1]  K. Nightingale,et al.  Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  M. Fink,et al.  Shear elasticity probe for soft tissues with 1-D transient elastography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  The role of viscosity in the impulse diffraction field of elastic waves induced by the acoustic radiation force , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  R. Bouchard,et al.  A finite-element method model of soft tissue response to impulsive acoustic radiation force , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Shigao Chen,et al.  Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Shear Wave Spectroscopy for In Vivo Quantification of Human Soft Tissues Visco-Elasticity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  C. Kasai,et al.  Real-Time Two-Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[10]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  D. Rubens,et al.  Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Y. Yamakoshi,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of internal vibration of soft tissue under forced vibration , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  G. Trahey,et al.  Ultrasonic tracking of acoustic radiation force-induced displacements in homogeneous media , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Y. Tsushima,et al.  Reliable Measurement Procedure of Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification With Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[16]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[17]  J. F. Greenleaf,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  Ralph Sinkus,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[20]  Mirko D'Onofrio,et al.  Tissue quantification with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: Measurement repeatability and normal values in the healthy liver. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  M. Fink,et al.  Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasibility study. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.