Visuomotor Learning Enhanced by Augmenting Instantaneous Trajectory Error Feedback during Reaching

We studied reach adaptation to a 30° visuomotor rotation to determine whether augmented error feedback can promote faster and more complete motor learning. Four groups of healthy adults reached with their unseen arm to visual targets surrounding a central starting point. A manipulandum tracked hand motion and projected a cursor onto a display immediately above the horizontal plane of movement. For one group, deviations from the ideal movement were amplified with a gain of 2 whereas another group experienced a gain of 3.1. The third group experienced an offset equal to the average error seen in the initial perturbations, while a fourth group served as controls. Learning in the gain 2 and offset groups was nearly twice as fast as controls. Moreover, the offset group averaged more reduction in error. Such error augmentation techniques may be useful for training novel visuomotor transformations as required of robotic teleoperators or in movement rehabilitation of the neurologically impaired.

[1]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Patton,et al.  Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Konrad Paul Körding,et al.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  C. Winstein,et al.  Motor learning after unilateral brain damage , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Perenin,et al.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect , 1998, Nature.

[10]  R. Nudo,et al.  Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. , 1999, Revue neurologique.

[11]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Nonlinear postural control in response to visual translation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[17]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Eckmiller Advanced neural computers , 1990 .

[19]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Feedback-Error-Learning Neural Network for Supervised Motor Learning , 1990 .

[21]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch , 2001, Nature.

[23]  F A Miles,et al.  Long-term adaptive changes in primate vestibuloocular reflex. I. Behavioral observations. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[26]  C. S. Harris Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[27]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[29]  James L. Patton,et al.  A Real-Time Haptic/Graphic Demonstration of how Error Augmentation can Enhance Learning , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[30]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.