Interconnected DeFi: Ripple Effects from the Terra Collapse

The emerging world of decentralized finance (DeFi), facilitated by smart contracts operating on blockchain networks, has been notable both for its rapid growth and the high-profile collapses of several of its largest participants. In this paper, we provide a technical account of the financial mechanisms which facilitated the growth and eventual collapse of the Terra Network. From this analysis, we outline a generalizable economic theory of blockchains which aims to differentiate the economics of blockchains as programmable environments from blockchains as accounting ledgers for crypto-assets. This adds to the existing literature on crypto-assets, which largely focuses on the financial characteristics of the crypto-assets themselves rather than their underlying blockchains. We argue that DeFi is structured so as to offer consumers distinct blockchain networks as competing choices differentiated by several key characteristics. We test several implications of this theory using Terra's collapse as a natural experiment, finding evidence that bridges between programmable blockchain networks create increased risk of spillover effects to other blockchains' programmable environments in the wake of a major shock event like Terra's collapse. Specifically, blockchains suffered a time-bound loss of market share and the likelihood of this loss grew approximately 40% for each additional bridge that was deployed in common with Terra at the time of Terra’s collapse.

[1]  Jiageng Liu,et al.  Anatomy of a Run: The Terra Luna Crash , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  L. Wall,et al.  Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Transformative Potential & Associated Risks , 2022, Finance and Economics Discussion Series.

[3]  Jacob Gerszten,et al.  The Financial Stability Implications of Digital Assets , 2022, Finance and Economics Discussion Series.

[4]  T. Aste,et al.  Anatomy of a Stablecoin's failure: the Terra-Luna case , 2022, Finance Research Letters.

[5]  H. Uhlig A Luna-tic Stablecoin Crash , 2022, Social Science Research Network.

[6]  John W. Goodell,et al.  What drives DeFi prices? Investigating the effects of investor attention , 2022, Finance Research Letters.

[7]  A. Schoar,et al.  Cryptocurrencies and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  I. Yousaf,et al.  Static and Dynamic Connectedness Between NFTs, Defi and Other Assets: Portfolio Implication , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Lanouar Charfeddine,et al.  Understanding digital bubbles amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from DeFi and NFTs , 2021, Finance research letters.

[10]  X. Vo,et al.  Quantile connectedness in the cryptocurrency market , 2021 .

[11]  Philipp Strack,et al.  Bitcoin: An Axiomatic Approach and an Impossibility Theorem , 2020 .

[12]  Fabian Schär Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-Based Financial Markets , 2020, Review.

[13]  Daniel Perez,et al.  The Decentralized Financial Crisis , 2020, 2020 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT).

[14]  R. Lyons,et al.  What Keeps Stablecoins Stable? , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets , 2019, International Review of Financial Analysis.

[16]  Giulio Cornelli,et al.  Blockchain scalability and the fragmentation of crypto , 2022 .

[17]  Vincent Maurin,et al.  Can Stablecoins Be Stable? , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  B. Lucey,et al.  Examining the Interrelatedness of NFT’s, DeFi Tokens and Cryptocurrencies , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.