Interlaboratory validation of the ToxTracker assay: An in vitro reporter assay for mechanistic genotoxicity assessment

ToxTracker is a mammalian cell reporter assay that predicts the genotoxic properties of compounds with high accuracy. By evaluating induction of various reporter genes that play a key role in relevant cellular pathways, it provides insight into chemical mode‐of‐action (MoA), thereby supporting discrimination of direct‐acting genotoxicants and cytotoxic chemicals. A comprehensive interlaboratory validation trial was conducted, in which the principles outlined in OECD Guidance Document 34 were followed, with the primary objectives of establishing transferability and reproducibility of the assay and confirming the ability of ToxTracker to correctly classify genotoxic and non‐genotoxic compounds. Reproducibility of the assay to predict genotoxic MoA was confirmed across participating laboratories and data were evaluated in terms of concordance with in vivo genotoxicity outcomes. Seven laboratories tested a total of 64 genotoxic and non‐genotoxic chemicals that together cover a broad chemical space. The within‐laboratory reproducibility (WLR) was up to 98% (73%–98% across participants) and the overall between‐laboratory reproducibility (BLR) was 83%. This trial confirmed the accuracy of ToxTracker to predict in vivo genotoxicants with a sensitivity of 84.4% and a specificity of 91.2%. We concluded that ToxTracker is a robust in vitro assay for the accurate prediction of in vivo genotoxicity. Considering ToxTracker's robust standalone accuracy and that it can provide important information on the MoA of chemicals, it is seen as a valuable addition to the regulatory in vitro genotoxicity battery that may even have the potential to replace certain currently used in vitro battery assays.

[1]  S. Doak,et al.  Multi-endpoint analysis of cadmium chloride-induced genotoxicity shows role for reactive oxygen species and p53 activation in DNA damage induction, cell cycle irregularities, and cell size aberrations , 2023, Mutagenesis.

[2]  A. M. Api,et al.  Utility of ToxTracker in animal alternative testing strategy for fragrance materials , 2023, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[3]  G. Hendriks,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of ToxTracker dose–response data for potency comparisons and mode‐of‐action determination , 2023, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[4]  S. Pfuhler,et al.  Assessing the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of 2-chloroethanol through structure activity relationships and in vitro testing approaches. , 2022, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  G. Hendriks,et al.  Evaluation of potential toxicity of smoke from controlled burns of furnished rooms – effect of flame retardancy , 2022, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[6]  M. Gaca,et al.  Application of ToxTracker for the toxicological assessment of tobacco and nicotine delivery products. , 2022, Toxicology letters.

[7]  R. Mesnage,et al.  Comparative Toxicogenomics of Glyphosate and Roundup Herbicides by Mammalian Stem Cell-Based Genotoxicity Assays and Molecular Profiling in Sprague-Dawley Rats , 2021, bioRxiv.

[8]  Dean P. Jones,et al.  Metabolome-wide association study of occupational exposure to benzene. , 2021, Carcinogenesis.

[9]  P. Rees,et al.  Empirical comparison of genotoxic potency estimations: the in vitro DNA-damage ToxTracker endpoints versus the in vivo micronucleus assay , 2021, Mutagenesis.

[10]  Wen Yin,et al.  Cancer and stem cells , 2021, Experimental biology and medicine.

[11]  G. Hendriks,et al.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols , 2021, Mutagenesis.

[12]  M. Aardema,et al.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin micronucleus (RSMN) assay: an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays , 2021, Mutagenesis.

[13]  S. Pfuhler,et al.  A comparison of classical and 21st century genotoxicity tools: A proof of concept study of 18 chemicals comparing in vitro micronucleus, ToxTracker and genomics‐based methods (TGx‐DDI, whole genome clustering and connectivity mapping) , 2020, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[14]  G. Hendriks,et al.  Aneugen versus clastogen evaluation and oxidative stress-related mode-of-action assessment of genotoxic compounds using the ToxTracker reporter assay. , 2020, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  P. White,et al.  EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database , 2020, Mutation research.

[16]  P. Carmichael,et al.  A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products , 2020, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  Targets and mechanisms of chemically induced aneuploidy. Part 1 of the report of the 2017 IWGT workgroup on assessing the risk of aneugens for carcinogenesis and hereditary diseases. , 2019, Mutation research.

[18]  Sandra Healy,et al.  The role of the unfolded protein response in cancer progression: From oncogenesis to chemoresistance , 2018, Biology of the cell.

[19]  T. Nohmi.  Thresholds of Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens , 2018, Toxicological research.

[20]  Xiangquan Liu,et al.  Lead Induces Genotoxicity via Oxidative Stress and Promoter Methylation of DNA Repair Genes in Human Lymphoblastoid TK6 Cells , 2018, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[21]  Juan Manuel Parra Morte,et al.  Clarification of some aspects related to genotoxicity assessment , 2017, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[22]  R Daniel Benz,et al.  Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations , 2017, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[23]  T. Morita,et al.  Comprehensive retrospective evaluation of existing in vitro chromosomal aberration test data by cytotoxicity index transformation. , 2016, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[24]  Harry Vrieling,et al.  The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding. , 2016, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[25]  R. Tice,et al.  The JaCVAM international validation study on the in vivo comet assay: Selection of test chemicals. , 2015, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[26]  R. Kaufman,et al.  The impact of the endoplasmic reticulum protein-folding environment on cancer development , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  J. Bemis,et al.  Interpreting in vitro micronucleus positive results: Simple biomarker matrix discriminates clastogens, aneugens, and misleading positive agents , 2014, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[28]  I. Bassanetti,et al.  Oxidative stress induced by copper and iron complexes with 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives causes paraptotic death of HeLa cancer cells. , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[29]  Sung-Hee Cho,et al.  In vivo roles of conjugation with glutathione and O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase in the mutagenicity of the bis-electrophiles 1,2-dibromoethane and 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane in mice. , 2013, Chemical research in toxicology.

[30]  S. Fukushima,et al.  Oxidative Stress in the Carcinogenicity of Chemical Carcinogens , 2013, Cancers.

[31]  G. Hendriks,et al.  Cellular‐signaling pathways unveil the carcinogenic potential of chemicals , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[32]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. II. Importance of accurate toxicity measurement. , 2012, Mutation research.

[33]  S. Miyamoto,et al.  DNA damage‐dependent NF‐κB activation: NEMO turns nuclear signaling inside out , 2012, Immunological reviews.

[34]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. , 2012, Mutation research.

[35]  M. Aardema,et al.  Workshop summary: Top concentration for in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays; and report from working group on toxicity measures and top concentration for in vitro cytogenetics assays (chromosome aberrations and micronucleus). , 2011, Mutation research.

[36]  B. van de Water,et al.  Sensitive DsRed fluorescence-based reporter cell systems for genotoxicity and oxidative stress assessment. , 2011, Mutation research.

[37]  David Kirkland,et al.  A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. , 2011, Mutation research.

[38]  S. Renaud,et al.  Benzene-initiated oxidative stress: Effects on embryonic signaling pathways. , 2010, Chemico-Biological Interactions.

[39]  H. van Steeg,et al.  Mechanisms of non-genotoxic carcinogens and importance of a weight of evidence approach. , 2009, Mutation research.

[40]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  ECVAM retrospective validation of in vitro micronucleus test (MNT) , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[41]  Guidance Document on the Validation and International Acceptance of New or Updated Test Methods for Hazard Assessment , 2005, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment.

[42]  S. Rhee,et al.  Characterization of Mammalian Sulfiredoxin and Its Reactivation of Hyperoxidized Peroxiredoxin through Reduction of Cysteine Sulfinic Acid in the Active Site to Cysteine* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  C. Chi,et al.  Rho/Rhotekin-mediated NF-κB activation confers resistance to apoptosis , 2004, Oncogene.

[44]  Micheline Kirsch-Volders,et al.  Indirect mechanisms of genotoxicity. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[45]  J. Błasiak,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity of lead acetate: induction of single and double DNA strand breaks and DNA-protein cross-links. , 2003, Mutation research.

[46]  J. Hoeijmakers.  Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer , 2001, Nature.

[47]  A. Li,et al.  A comparison of aroclor 1254-induced and uninduced rat liver microsomes to human liver microsomes in phenytoin O-deethylation, coumarin 7-hydroxylation, tolbutamide 4-hydroxylation, S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation, chloroxazone 6-hydroxylation and testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation. , 2001, Chemico-biological interactions.

[48]  Michael Müller,et al.  Mutagenicity of N-nitrosodiethylamine in the Ames test with S. typhimurium TA1535 is due to volatile metabolites and is not dependent on cytochrome P4502E1 induction , 2000, Archives of Toxicology.

[49]  D. Eastmond,et al.  BENZENE-INDUCED GENOTOXICITY: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE , 2000, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[50]  J Whysner,et al.  BENZENE-INDUCED GENOTOXICITY , 2000, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[51]  F. A. Aly,et al.  In vivo and in vitro studies on the genotoxicity of cadmium chloride in mice , 2000, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[52]  G. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of possible genotoxic mechanisms for acrylonitrile tumorigenicity. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[53]  Gary M Williams,et al.  Formation of 8-oxodeoxyguanosine in brain DNA of rats exposed to acrylonitrile , 1998, Archives of Toxicology.

[54]  R. Berger,et al.  Identification of BTG2, an antiproliferative p53–dependent component of the DNA damage cellular response pathway , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[55]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Molecular Cloning and Expression of Human Liver Biliverdin-IXβ Reductase , 1996 .

[56]  K. Morimoto,et al.  Geno toxicity of benzene and its metabolites increase of sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes , 1981 .

[57]  Anton Simeonov,et al.  The US Federal Tox21 Program: A strategic and operational plan for continued leadership. , 2018, ALTEX.

[58]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests. , 2016, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[59]  B. van de Water,et al.  The ToxTracker assay: novel GFP reporter systems that provide mechanistic insight into the genotoxic properties of chemicals. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[60]  humAn cArcinogens,et al.  iArc monogrAphs on the evAluAtion oF cArcinogenic risks to humAns , 2012 .

[61]  F. Sitas.  IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (incl Sitas F.) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. A Review of Human Carcinogens , 2011 .

[62]  Jeou-Yuan Chen,et al.  Rho/Rhotekin-mediated NF-kappaB activation confers resistance to apoptosis. , 2004, Oncogene.

[63]  Photostability Testing.  INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE , 1996 .