Evaluation of Hamamatsu PET Imaging Modules for Dedicated TOF-Capable Scanners

Time-of-flight (TOF) capability is becoming an important capability offered in both commercial and research PET scanners. Often commercial vendors and laboratory researchers develop and utilize proprietary electronics for their devices. Consequently, it is challenging for independent research groups to develop their own TOF-PET scanners. In this investigation, we tested a prototype scanner consisting of commercially available TOF-capable modules from Hamamatsu photonics that can be used as building blocks for PET scanners. The scanner consists of a ring of 16 modules, for a total diameter of 26.7 cm. Testing demonstrated that the scanner is capable of sustaining ~1MHz single counting rate with a peak noise equivalent count rate of 117.5 kHz at 75.25 MBq measured with NEMA NU-4 “rat” phantom. Spatial resolution of 2.3–5 mm from the center of the scanner was measured. Energy resolution of 17.2% at 511 keV was measured. Peak sensitivity of 1.28% is reported. All the measurements were performed with energy cuts from 350 to 700 keV. Finally, scanner timing resolution was found to be 462 ps. Results from testing of a prototype scanner constructed using newly released TOF-capable detector modules produced by Hamamatsu demonstrated the promise for these devices to create high performance PET system with TOF capabilities.

[1]  H. Du,et al.  A new modular and scalable detector for a Time-of-Flight PET scanner , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[2]  M. Conti.  Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  T. Budinger.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-DPET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  M. Ter-pogossian,et al.  Experimental Assessment of the Gain Achieved by the Utilization of Time-of-Flight Information in a Positron Emission Tomograph (Super PETT I) , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  R.R. Raylman,et al.  PEM-PET Image Reconstruction in a Clinically-Relevant Time Frame , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  D L Snyder,et al.  Photon Time‐of-Flight‐Assisted Positron Emission Tomography , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  J. Karp,et al.  Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  D. Schaart,et al.  The statistical distribution of the number of counted scintillation photons in digital silicon photomultipliers: model and validation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  NEMA NU 4-2008 Comparison of Preclinical PET Imaging Systems , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  E. Charbon,et al.  An order-statistics-inspired, fully-digital readout approach for analog SiPM arrays , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[15]  Bruce H. T. Chai,et al.  Lutetium Yttrium Orthosilicate Single Crystal Scintillator Detector , 2016 .

[16]  Stefan Seifert,et al.  Improving the Time Resolution of TOF-PET Detectors by Double-Sided Readout , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital silicon photomultiplier — Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[18]  Min Sun Lee,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Proof-Of-Concept Prototype Time-Of-Flight PET System Based on High Quantum Efficiency Multi-anode PMTs , 2015 .

[19]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Positron emission tomography , 1988, Seminars in neurology.

[20]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Time-of-flight PET. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[21]  Jorge Cabello,et al.  PET performance evaluation of MADPET4: a small animal PET insert for a 7 T MRI scanner , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D. Townsend,et al.  An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  W. Moses,et al.  Prospects for time-of-flight PET using LSO scintillator , 1999 .

[24]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. , 2011, Medical physics.