Reversal to air-driven sound production revealed by a molecular phylogeny of tongueless frogs, family Pipidae

BackgroundEvolutionary novelties often appear by conferring completely new functions to pre-existing structures or by innovating the mechanism through which a particular function is performed. Sound production plays a central role in the behavior of frogs, which use their calls to delimit territories and attract mates. Therefore, frogs have evolved complex vocal structures capable of producing a wide variety of advertising sounds. It is generally acknowledged that most frogs call by moving an air column from the lungs through the glottis with the remarkable exception of the family Pipidae, whose members share a highly specialized sound production mechanism independent of air movement.ResultsHere, we performed behavioral observations in the poorly known African pipid genus Pseudhymenochirus and document that the sound production in this aquatic frog is almost certainly air-driven. However, morphological comparisons revealed an indisputable pipid nature of Pseudhymenochirus larynx. To place this paradoxical pattern into an evolutionary framework, we reconstructed robust molecular phylogenies of pipids based on complete mitochondrial genomes and nine nuclear protein-coding genes that coincided in placing Pseudhymenochirus nested among other pipids.ConclusionsWe conclude that although Pseudhymenochirus probably has evolved a reversal to the ancestral non-pipid condition of air-driven sound production, the mechanism through which it occurs is an evolutionary innovation based on the derived larynx of pipids. This strengthens the idea that evolutionary solutions to functional problems often emerge based on previous structures, and for this reason, innovations largely depend on possibilities and constraints predefined by the particular history of each lineage.

[1]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[2]  Diego San Mauro,et al.  Initial diversification of living amphibians predated the breakup of pangaea , 2005 .

[3]  A. Meyer,et al.  Phylogeny and comparative substitution rates of frogs inferred from sequences of three nuclear genes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  A. Haas The larval hyobranchial apparatus of discoglossoid frogs: its structure and bearing on the systematics of the Anura (Amphibia: Anura) , 2009 .

[5]  W. Ponder,et al.  Gastropod evolutionary rates and phylogenetic relationships assessed using partial 28S rDNA and histone H3 sequences , 2000 .

[6]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[7]  L. Trueb,et al.  Biology of Amphibians , 1986 .

[8]  F. Hoffmann,et al.  Gene cooption and convergent evolution of oxygen transport hemoglobins in jawed and jawless vertebrates , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Carroll,et al.  Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty , 2009, Nature.

[10]  L. Trueb,et al.  Evolution of Pipoid Frogs: Morphology and Phylogenetic Relationships of Pseudhymenochirus , 1988 .

[11]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[12]  K. Roelants,et al.  Archaeobatrachian paraphyly and pangaean diversification of crown-group frogs. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[13]  M. Vences,et al.  Bioacoustic differentiation in Painted frogs (Discoglossus) , 1991 .

[14]  D. Wake,et al.  Rapid diversification and dispersal during periods of global warming by plethodontid salamanders , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  S. Gould,et al.  Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form , 1982, Paleobiology.

[16]  Iker Irisarri,et al.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the relict frog Leiopelma archeyi: Insights into the root of the frog Tree of Life , 2010, Mitochondrial DNA.

[17]  E. Dunn American frogs of the family Pipidae. American Museum novitates ; no. 1384 , 1948 .

[18]  A. Bennett The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1872, Nature.

[19]  C. Pearl,et al.  Evidence for a Mate-Attracting Chemosignal in the Dwarf African Clawed Frog Hymenochirus , 2000, Hormones and Behavior.

[20]  D. D. Yager A unique sound production mechanism in the pipid anuran Xenopus borealis , 1992 .

[21]  D. Cannatella,et al.  THE MAJOR CLADES OF FROGS , 1993 .

[22]  Peter C. Wainwright,et al.  Raptorial jaws in the throat help moray eels swallow large prey , 2007, Nature.

[23]  R. Tinsley,et al.  Biology of Xenopus , 1998 .

[24]  R. Zardoya,et al.  Phylogeny of caecilian amphibians (Gymnophiona) based on complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear RAG1. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[25]  The significance of water surface-waves in the communication of fire-bellied toads , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[26]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny and Its Impact on Evolutionary Biology , 2001, Science.

[27]  M. Pagel,et al.  Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[28]  F. Jacob,et al.  Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.

[29]  Diego San Mauro,et al.  A multilocus timescale for the origin of extant amphibians. , 2010, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[30]  B. Roe,et al.  The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  G. Rabb On the Unique Sound Production of the Surinam Toad, Pipa pipa , 1960 .

[32]  D. Cannatella,et al.  Xenopus Laevis as a Model Organism , 1993 .

[33]  J. Lynch The transition from archaic to advanced frogs , 1970 .

[34]  G. Rabb,et al.  On the behavior and breeding biology of the African pipid frog: Hymenochirus boettgeri , 2010 .

[35]  G. K. Noble The Biology of the Amphibia , 1954 .

[36]  L. Trueb,et al.  A NEW PIPOID ANURAN FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF SOUTH AFRICA , 2005 .

[37]  S. Brenner,et al.  Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  P. Moler,et al.  THE AMPHIBIAN TREE OF LIFE , 2006 .

[39]  P. Wakeley,et al.  Synthesis , 2013, The Role of Animals in Emerging Viral Diseases.

[40]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[41]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[42]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  Exploring New Search Algorithms and Hardware for Phylogenetics: RAxML Meets the IBM Cell , 2007, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[44]  Friedrich Ladich,et al.  Sound Production and Acoustic Communication , 2004 .

[45]  D. Kelley,et al.  A mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of African clawed frogs: phylogeography and implications for polyploid evolution. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[46]  S. A. Barnett,et al.  The major features of evolution , 1955 .

[47]  C. Gissi,et al.  Mitochondrial phylogeny of Anura (Amphibia): a case study of congruent phylogenetic reconstruction using amino acid and nucleotide characters. , 2006, Gene.

[48]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[49]  W. K. Parker I. On the structure and development of the skull of the common frog (Rana temporaria) , 1871, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[50]  W. G. Ridewood On the Structure and Development of the Hyobranchial Skeleton and Larynx in Xenopus and Pipa; with Remarks on the Affinities of the Aglossa. , 1897 .

[51]  J. Felsenstein CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  Robert K. Jansen,et al.  Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA , 2004, Bioinform..

[53]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[54]  R. Wassersug,et al.  A procedure for differential staining of cartilage and bone in whole formalin-fixed vertebrates. , 1976, Stain technology.

[55]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models , 2006, Bioinform..

[56]  A A NylanderJohan,et al.  AWTY (are we there yet , 2008 .

[57]  Mattia D'Antonio,et al.  MitoZoa: a curated mitochondrial genome database of metazoans for comparative genomics studies. , 2010, Mitochondrion.

[58]  L. Trueb,et al.  Evolution of pipoid frogs intergeneric relationships of the aquatic frog family pipidae anura , 1988 .

[59]  D. Gower,et al.  Global patterns of diversification in the history of modern amphibians , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  L. Trueb,et al.  Revisiting the contribution of larval characters to an analysis of phylogenetic relationships of basal anurans , 2003 .

[61]  W. G. Ridewood On the Hyobranchial Skeleton and Larynx of the new Aglossal Toad, Hymenochirus Boettgeri. , 1900 .

[62]  Masami Hasegawa,et al.  CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection , 2001, Bioinform..

[63]  David Posada,et al.  ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution , 2005, Bioinform..

[64]  B. Merker,et al.  The Natural History of Human Language: Bridging the Gaps without Magic , 2007 .

[65]  J. Boore Animal mitochondrial genomes. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[66]  Ryan Scherle,et al.  LINKING BIG: THE CONTINUING PROMISE OF EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[67]  C. Darwin On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[68]  James C. Wilgenbusch,et al.  AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics , 2008, Bioinform..

[69]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Emergence of Communication and Language , 2006 .

[70]  J. Felsenstein Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[71]  Peter Weygoldt Beobachtungen zur Biologie und Ethologie von Pipa (Hemipipa) carvalhoi Mir. RiB. 1937. (Anura, Pipidae)1 , 1976 .

[72]  J. L. Vial Evolutionary biology of the anurans;: Contemporary research on major problems , 1973 .

[73]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..