Customised text entry devices for motor-impaired users.

The standard QWERTY keyboard is the principal text entry device for word processing and computer-based communications. For many motor-impaired individuals, and in particular those without intelligible speech, the low text entry rates they can typically achieve is a major problem. For some, the QWERTY design is completely inappropriate. Alternative designs that can appreciably increase these rates would greatly enhance their ability to communicate. This paper considers and compares several approaches to the design of text entry devices for motor-impaired users. A general method for customising (i e, optimising) these designs is employed, and consideration is given to designs requiring significantly fewer input switches than the 26 or more keys required by QWERTY. Use is made of language statistics in the design procedure, and the increased availability of inexpensive, powerful computers is directly exploited.

[1]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[2]  L. A. Kilgore,et al.  Human factors in engineering , 1958, Electrical Engineering.

[3]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[4]  Nancy C. Goodwin Cursor Positioning on an Electronic Display Using Lightpen, Lightgun, or Keyboard for Three Basic Tasks , 1975 .

[5]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D. E. Glover,et al.  Experimentation with an adaptive search strategy for solving a keyboard design/configuration problem , 1986 .

[7]  Lawrence J. Fogel,et al.  Artificial Intelligence through Simulated Evolution , 1966 .

[8]  R. Damper Text composition by the physically disabled: a rate prediction model for scanning input. , 1984, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  R. Conrad,et al.  STANDARD TYPEWRITER VERSUS CHORD KEYBOARD – AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON , 1965 .

[10]  Michael J. Rosen,et al.  The Tufts-MIT Prescription Guide: Assessment of Users to Predict the Suitability of Augmentative Communication Devices , 1989 .

[11]  C Goodenough-Trepagnier,et al.  Derivation of an Efficient Nonvocal Communication System , 1982, Human factors.

[12]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Adaptive System Design: A Genetic Approach , 1980, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Nathaniel Rochester,et al.  The Chord Keyboard , 1978, Computer.