Aerodynamics of intermittent bounds in flying birds

Flap-bounding is a common flight style in small birds in which flapping phases alternate with flexed-wing bounds. Body lift is predicted to be essential to making this flight style an aerodynamically attractive flight strategy. To elucidate the contributions of the body and tail to lift and drag during the flexed-wing bound phase, we used particle image velocimetry (PIV) and measured properties of the wake of zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata, N = 5), flying at 6–10 m s−1 in a variable speed wind tunnel as well as flow around taxidermically prepared specimens (N = 4) mounted on a sting instrumented with force transducers. For the specimens, we varied air velocity from 2 to 12 m s−1 and body angle from −15° to 50°. The wake of bounding birds and mounted specimens consisted of a pair of counter-rotating vortices shed into the wake from the tail, with induced downwash in the sagittal plane and upwash in parasagittal planes lateral to the bird. This wake structure was present even when the tail was entirely removed. We observed good agreement between force measures derived from PIV and force transducers over the range of body angles typically used by zebra finch during forward flight. Body lift:drag (L:D) ratios averaged 1.4 in live birds and varied between 1 and 1.5 in specimens at body angles from 10° to 30°. Peak (L:D) ratio was the same in live birds and specimens (1.5) and was exhibited in specimens at body angles of 15° or 20°, consistent with the lower end of body angles utilized during bounds. Increasing flight velocity in live birds caused a decrease in CL and CD from maximum values of 1.19 and 0.95 during flight at 6 m s−1 to minimum values of 0.70 and 0.54 during flight at 10 m s−1. Consistent with delta-wing theory as applied to birds with a graduated-tail shape, trimming the tail to 0 and 50% of normal length reduced L:D ratios and extending tail length to 150% of normal increased L:D ratio. As downward induced velocity is present in the sagittal plane during upstroke of flapping flight, we hypothesize that body lift is produced during flapping phases. Future efforts to model the mechanics of intermittent flight should take into account that flap-bounding birds may support up to 20% of their weight even with their wings fully flexed.

[1]  Bret W Tobalske,et al.  Contractile activity of the pectoralis in the zebra finch according to mode and velocity of flap-bounding flight , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Bret W. Tobalske,et al.  Morphology, Velocity, and Intermittent Flight in Birds1 , 2001 .

[3]  G. Taylor,et al.  Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Markus Raffel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide , 2002 .

[5]  Bret W. Tobalske,et al.  SCALING OF MUSCLE COMPOSITION, WING MORPHOLOGY, AND INTERMITTENT FLIGHT BEHAVIOR IN WOODPECKERS , 1996 .

[6]  J. Rayner,et al.  Lift generation by the avian tail , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Vortex wakes of birds: recent developments using digital particle image velocimetry in a wind tunnel , 2006 .

[8]  Sandra Nauwelaerts,et al.  Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs II. Application of a vortex ring model to DPIV data , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  Tobalske,et al.  NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL AND KINEMATICS OF INTERMITTENT FLIGHT IN BUDGERIGARS (MELOPSITTACUS UNDULATUS) , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  A. Biewener,et al.  In vivo pectoralis muscle force-length behavior during level flight in pigeons (Columba livia) , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  J. Marden From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  C. J. Pennycuick,et al.  Empirical estimates of body drag of large waterfowl and raptors , 1988 .

[13]  C. J. Pennycuick,et al.  Chapter 1 – MECHANICS OF FLIGHT , 1975 .

[14]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[16]  A Hedenström,et al.  Field estimates of body drag coefficient on the basis of dives in passerine birds. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[17]  A. Hedenström,et al.  OPTIMAL FLIGHT SPEED OF BIRDS , 1995 .

[18]  A. J. Ward-Smith,et al.  Analysis of the aerodynamic performance of birds during bounding flight , 1984 .

[19]  Jeremy M. V. Rayner,et al.  Bounding and undulating flight in birds , 1985 .

[20]  J. Rayner Estimating power curves of flying vertebrates. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  F. Fuchs,et al.  Length, force, and Ca(2+)-troponin C affinity in cardiac and slow skeletal muscle. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  A. Biewener,et al.  Mechanical power output of bird flight , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Jmv Rayner,et al.  Momentum and energy in the wake of a pigeon (Columba livia) in slow flight , 1984 .

[24]  J. M. V. Rayner,et al.  The avian tail reduces body parasite drag by controlling flow separation and vortex shedding , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  G. R. Spedding,et al.  Quantitative studies of the wakes of freely flying birds in a low-turbulence wind tunnel , 2003 .

[26]  Tobalske Neuromuscular control and kinematics of intermittent flight in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Dynamic pressure maps for wings and tails of pigeons in slow, flapping flight, and their energetic implications , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  A G Hammitt AERODYNAMICS OF VEHICLES IN FINITE LENGTH TUBES , 1974 .

[29]  A. Biewener,et al.  Comparative power curves in bird flight , 2003, Nature.

[30]  Feather Damage of Long Tails in Barn Swallows Hirundo Rustica , 2003 .

[31]  B. Tobalske,et al.  Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird , 2005, Nature.

[32]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Vortices behind a bluff body with an upswept aft section in ground effect , 2004 .

[33]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  THE OPTIMUM FLIGHT SPEEDS OF FLYING ANIMALS , 1998 .

[34]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  Matthew R Evans,et al.  How do birds' tails work? Delta–wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Experimental manipulation of tail length in female barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) affects their future reproductive success , 2003 .

[37]  S. Hoerner Fluid Dynamic Drag: Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance , 1965 .

[38]  Adrian L. R. Thomas On the aerodynamics of birds’ tails , 1993 .

[39]  V. Tucker,et al.  Bird Metabolism During Flight: Evaluation of a Theory , 1973 .

[40]  Bret W Tobalske,et al.  Biomechanics of bird flight , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[41]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[42]  A Hedenström,et al.  A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[43]  A. J. Ward-Smith Aerodynamic and energetic considerations relating to undulating and bounding flight in birds , 1984 .

[44]  W. Hucho,et al.  Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles , 1987 .

[45]  Matthew R Evans,et al.  Birds' tails do act like delta wings but delta-wing theory does not always predict the forces they generate , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  A Hedenström,et al.  Vortex wakes generated by robins Erithacus rubecula during free flight in a wind tunnel , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[47]  Tobalske,et al.  Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[48]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Wingbeat frequency and the body drag anomaly: wind-tunnel observations on a thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and a teal (Anas crecca) , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[49]  V. Tucker BODY DRAG, FEATHER DRAG AND INTERFERENCE DRAG OF THE MOUNTING STRUT IN A PEREGRINE FALCON, FALCO PEREGRINUS , 1990 .

[50]  F. Liechti,et al.  Flexibility in flight behaviour of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and house martins (Delichon urbica) tested in a wind tunnel. , 2001, Journal of Experimental Biology.