Thematic emphasis in language production

In three experiments, we investigate whether speakers tend to perseverate in the assignment of emphasis to concepts with particular thematic roles across utterances. Participants matched prime sentences involving clefts (e.g., Het is de cowboy die hij slaat, “It is the cowboy that he is hitting”) to pictures and then described unrelated transitive events. Participants were more likely to produce a passive after a cleft that emphasised the patient than after a cleft that emphasised the agent. Because prime and target sentences are syntactically unrelated, our study demonstrated nonsyntactic structural priming. We propose that speakers use such priming to facilitate the construction of coherent discourse.

[1]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[2]  P. Dixon Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs , 2008 .

[3]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[4]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[5]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach , 2009, Cognition.

[6]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[7]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[8]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[9]  C. Osgood Where do sentences come from , 1971 .

[10]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[11]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production , 2000, Cognition.

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Ruth Henderson,et al.  Case by case. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[15]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .

[16]  Martin J Pickering,et al.  The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Thomas Wasow End-Weight from the Speaker's Perspective , 1997 .

[18]  Mercè Prat-Sala,et al.  Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production , 2000 .

[19]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[23]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[24]  Kathy Y. van Nice,et al.  Task sensitivity of animacy effects: evidence from German picture descriptions , 2003 .

[25]  Peter Abell,et al.  A Case for Cases , 2009 .

[26]  Larry Harrison,et al.  The Information Component , 1989 .

[27]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[28]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[29]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Priming Word Order in Sentence Production , 1999 .

[30]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[31]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[32]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[33]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[34]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[35]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Persistence in Dutch , 1998, Language and speech.

[36]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[37]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[38]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[41]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Providing a Unified Account of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse , 1983, ACL.

[42]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  The Time Course of the Influence of Implicit Causality Information: Focusing versus Integration Accounts , 2000 .

[43]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Effect of Focus on Memory for Words in Sentences , 1995 .

[44]  A. Almor Constraints and Mechanisms in Theories of Anaphor Processing , 2000 .

[45]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[46]  V. Ferreira,et al.  The functions of structural priming , 2006, Language and cognitive processes.

[47]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus , 1968 .

[48]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[49]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[50]  A. Garnham,et al.  The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.

[51]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Structural priming across languages , 2003 .

[52]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .

[53]  M. Pickering,et al.  The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming , 2007 .

[54]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[55]  G. Dell,et al.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production , 2007, Cognition.

[56]  S. Sridhar Cognition and sentence production : a cross-linguistic study , 1990 .

[57]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production , 2008 .

[58]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[59]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .