Uncertainty propagation and speculation in projective forecasts of environmental change - a lake eutrophication example.

The issue of whether models developed for current conditions can yield correct predictions when used under changed control, as is often the case in environmental management, is discussed. Two models of different complexity are compared on the basis of performance criteria, but it appears that good performance at the calibration stage does not guarantee correctly predicted behavior. A requirement for the detection of such a failure of the model is that the prediction uncertainty range is known. Two techniques to calculate uncertainty propagation are presented and compared: a stochastic first-order error propagation based on the extended Kalman filter (EKF), and a newly developed and robust Monte Carlo set-membership procedure (MCSM). The procedures are applied to a case study of water quality, generating a projective forecast of the algal dynamics in a lake (Lake Veluwe) in response to management actions that force the system into a different mode of behavior. It is found that the forecast from the more complex model falls within the prediction uncertainty range, but its informative value is low due to large uncertainty bounds. As a substitute for time-consuming revisions of the model, educated speculation about parameter shifts is offered as an alternative approach to account for expected but unmodelled changes in the system.

[1]  F. J. Los.  An Algal Bloom Model as a Tool to Simulate Management Measures , 1980 .

[2]  G. V. Straten,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Parameters and Uncertainty in Phytoplankton Models , 1983 .

[3]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Uncertainty and forecasting of water quality , 1983 .

[4]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[5]  Robert V. Thomann,et al.  Verification of Water Quality Models , 1982 .

[6]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Validation of a prognosis based upon a eutrophication model , 1986 .

[7]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems , 1981 .

[8]  R. P. Canale,et al.  Comparison of first‐order error analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation in time‐dependent lake eutrophication models , 1981 .

[9]  Raymond P. Canale,et al.  Variance estimates for a dynamic eutrophication model of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron , 1981 .

[10]  James N. Kremer,et al.  Ecological implications of parameter uncertainty in stochastic simulation , 1983 .

[11]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Structural dynamic model , 1986 .

[12]  V. J. Bierman,et al.  Modeling of Phytoplankton in Saginaw Bay: II. Post-Audit Phase , 1986 .

[13]  R. H. Gardner,et al.  Parameter Uncertainty and Model Predictions: A Review of Monte Carlo Results , 1983 .

[14]  J. A. Spriet.  Structure Characterization - An Overview , 1985 .

[15]  László Somlyódy,et al.  Modeling and Managing Shallow Lake Eutrophication: With Application to Lake Balaton , 1986 .

[16]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Uncertainty and arbitrariness in ecosystems modelling: A lake modelling example , 1981 .

[17]  M. B. Beck.  Hard or soft environmental systems , 1981 .

[18]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[19]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Modelling algal behaviour in the river thames , 1984 .

[20]  László Somlyódy,et al.  Modeling and Managing Shallow Lake Eutrophication , 1986 .

[21]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[22]  Karel J. Keesman,et al.  Identification and prediction propagation of uncertainty in models with bounded noise , 1989 .