Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common finding in MRI scans and X-rays. However, their correlation to morphological and biochemical changes is not well established. In this study, radiological and MRI parameters of DDD were assessed and compared with morphological and biochemical findings of disc degeneration. Thirty-nine human lumbar discs (L1–S1), age 19–86 years, were harvested from eight cadavers. Within 48 h postmortem, MRIs in various spin-echo sequences and biplanar radiographs of intact spines were obtained. Individual discs with endplates were then sectioned in the mid-sagittal plane and graded according to the morphological appearance. Samples from the nucleus of each disc were harvested for biochemical analysis including water and proteoglycan contents. On MRIs, T2-signal intensity, Modic changes, disc extension beyond the interspace (DEBIT), nucleus pulposus shape, annular tears, osteophytes and endplate integrity were graded. On radiographs, an independent observer classified the parameters disc height, endplate sclerosis, osteophytes, Schmorl’s nodes, intradiscal calcifications and endplate shape. General linear-regression models were used for statistical analysis. Backward elimination with a 10% significance cut-off level was used to identify the most significant parameters, which then were summed to create composite scores for radiography, MRI and the combination of both methods. The grading was performed by three observers, and a reliability analysis using Cronbach’s alpha model was used to control interobserver agreement. The three radiographic parameters height-loss, osteophytes and intradiscal calcifications correlated significantly with the morphological degree of degeneration (p<0.001, R2=642). Significant differences of even one morphological grade could also be differentiated in the composite radiological score (p<0.05), except at the extremes between grades 1 and 2 and grades 4 and 5. All MRI parameters correlated significantly with the morphological grade (p<0.05); however Modic changes, T2-intensity and osteophytes accounted for 83% of the variation in the data. T2-signal intensity correlated significantly with H2O and proteoglycan content (p<0.001), and was best for detecting highly degenerated discs. Regression showed that the combined score was better correlated with the morphological grade (p<0.001, R2=775) than either the composite radiographic (p<0.001, R2=642) or composite MRI (p<0.001, R2=696) alone. Based on the combined score, a backwards elimination of the regression was performed, in which the parameters Modic changes, and T2-intensity loss (MRI) as well as calcifications (X-ray) accounted for 87% of the variability. The interobserver validation showed a high correlation for all three scores (Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.95 to 0.97). Conclusion: selective imaging parameters and a newly created scoring scheme were found to correlate with disc degeneration as determined in a morphological manner. Surprisingly, radiographic parameters were able to distinguish different stages of degeneration, whereas MRI could only detect advanced stages of disc degeneration. We conclude that X-rays may remain a cost-effective, non-invasive in vivo-grading method to detect early disc degeneration, and, combined with MRI, correlate best with morphological and biochemical assessment of disc degeneration.

[1]  S. Roberts,et al.  Transport Properties of the Human Cartilage Endplate in Relation to Its Composition and Calcification , 1996, Spine.

[2]  M. Aebi,et al.  The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[3]  T J Masaryk,et al.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[4]  MALCOLM H. POPE,et al.  Water Content in Human Intervertebral Discs: Part I. Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1987, Spine.

[5]  R. Fraser,et al.  MRI and discography of annular tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. A prospective clinical comparison. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  D. Buttle,et al.  Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. , 1986, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  Sally Roberts,et al.  Does the thickness of the vertebral subchondral bone reflect the composition of the intervertebral disc? , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[8]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Scheme for Grading the Gross Morphology of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1990, Spine.

[9]  D. Resnick,et al.  Degenerative Diseases of the Vertebral Column , 1985, Radiology.

[10]  K. Opeskin,et al.  The Pathogenesis of Schmorl's Nodes in Relation to Acute Trauma: An Autopsy Study , 1998, Spine.

[11]  J. Troup,et al.  Plain Radiographic, Discographic, and Direct Observations of Schmorl's Nodes in the Thoracolumbar Junctional Region of the Cadaveric Spine , 1987, Spine.

[12]  M Kormano,et al.  Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. , 1991, Spine.

[13]  G. Pike,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of degenerative disc disease , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  A. Silman,et al.  The distribution, determinants, and clinical correlates of vertebral osteophytosis: a population based survey. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[15]  P. Renton,et al.  Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[16]  S. Roberts,et al.  Biochemical and Structural Properties of the Cartilage End-Plate and its Relation to the Intervertebral Disc , 1989, Spine.

[17]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Schmorl nodes of the thoracic and lumbar spine: radiographic-pathologic study of prevalence, characterization, and correlation with degenerative changes of 1,650 spinal levels in 100 cadavers. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  J Pentti,et al.  Recurrent low back pain and early disc degeneration in the young. , 1999, Spine.

[19]  N. Roberts,et al.  The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[20]  Keita Ito,et al.  2004 Young Investigator Award Winner: Vertebral Endplate Marrow Contact Channel Occlusions and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2005, Spine.

[21]  D G Wilder,et al.  Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. An epidemiological study in men. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  H. Paajanen,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Study of Disc Degeneration in Young Low-Back Pain Patients , 1989, Spine.

[23]  S. Furner,et al.  Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States , 1992 .

[24]  C. Hamanishi,et al.  Schmorl's nodes on magnetic resonance imaging. Their incidence and clinical relevance. , 1994, Spine.

[25]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Objektive Messung der Hhe lumbaler Bandscheiben aus seitlichen Rntgen-bersichtsaufnahmen* , 2008 .

[26]  L. Gilula,et al.  Radiologic and pathologic patterns of end-plate-based vertebral sclerosis. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[27]  R. Benn,et al.  Vertebral end-plate lesions (Schmorl's nodes) in the dorsolumbar spine. , 1976, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[28]  E Viikari-Juntura,et al.  Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. , 2000, Spine.

[29]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain , 2017, AL-QADISIYAH MEDICAL JOURNAL.

[30]  T. Lamer Lumbar Spine Pain Originating From Vertebral Osteophytes , 1999, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[31]  G. Andersson Epidemiology of low back pain. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[32]  Nicholas,et al.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  S. Roberts,et al.  The cartilage end‐plate and intervertebral disc in scoliosis: Calcification and other sequelae , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  V. Haughton,et al.  Tears of the anulus fibrosus: correlation between MR and pathologic findings in cadavers. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[35]  H. Paajanen,et al.  Age-dependent correlation of low-back pain and lumbar disc degeneration , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[36]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[37]  M. Modic,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of low back pain. , 1991, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[38]  J. Bolton,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Study Correlating Lumbar Spine Degeneration With Disability and Pain , 2000, Spine.

[39]  I Macnab,et al.  The traction spur. An indicator of segmental instability. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.