Acoustic Behavior of Halobacterium salinarum Gas Vesicles in the High-Frequency Range: Experiments and Modeling.

Gas vesicles (GVs) are a new and unique class of biologically derived ultrasound contrast agents with sub-micron size whose acoustic properties have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the acoustic collapse pressure and behavior of Halobacterium salinarum gas vesicles at transmit center frequencies ranging from 12.5 to 27.5 MHz. The acoustic collapse pressure was found to be above 550 kPa at all frequencies, nine-fold higher than the critical pressure observed under hydrostatic conditions. We illustrate that gas vesicles behave non-linearly when exposed to ultrasound at incident pressure ranging from 160 kPa to the collapse pressure and generate second harmonic amplitudes of -2 to -6 dB below the fundamental in media with viscosities ranging from 0.89 to 8 mPa·s. Simulations performed using a Rayleigh-Plesset-type model accounting for buckling and a dynamic finite-element analysis suggest that buckling is the mechanism behind the generation of harmonics. We found good agreement between the level of second harmonic relative to the fundamental measured at 20 MHz and the Rayleigh-Plesset model predictions. Finite-element simulations extended these findings to a non-spherical geometry, confirmed that the acoustic buckling pressure corresponds to the critical pressure under hydrostatic conditions and support the hypothesis of limited gas flow across the GV shell during the compression phase in the frequency range investigated. From simulations, estimates of GV bandwidth-limited scattering indicate that a single GV has a scattering cross section comparable to that of a red blood cell. These findings will inform the development of GV-based contrast agents and pulse sequences to optimize their detection with ultrasound.

[1]  A. Walsby,et al.  The gas permeability coefficient of the cyanobacterial gas vesicle wall , 1992 .

[2]  Xinmai Yang,et al.  A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Spider silk as archetypal protein elastomer. , 2006, Soft matter.

[4]  F. Pfeifer,et al.  Distribution, formation and regulation of gas vesicles , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Biogenic Gas Nanostructures as Ultrasonic Molecular Reporters , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[7]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk as a Biomaterial. , 2007, Progress in polymer science.

[8]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[9]  R. Karshafian,et al.  The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  A. Imhof,et al.  Anisotropic colloids through non-trivial buckling , 2008, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[11]  E. Chérin,et al.  A new transducer receive transfer function calibration method: application to microbubble backscattering cross-section measurements at high frequency , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  R. Cobbold Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound , 2006 .

[13]  R. Rosenson,et al.  Distribution of blood viscosity values and biochemical correlates in healthy adults. , 1996 .

[14]  P. Burns,et al.  Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  G. Gompper,et al.  Compression, crumpling and collapse of spherical shells and capsules , 2011 .

[16]  R. Campbell,et al.  Tumor physiology and delivery of nanopharmaceuticals. , 2006, Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry.