Digital Perception Functionality for Institutional Design: The Forest Policy Issue of "Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" of Scotland as a Case Study

Motivation for this research was the need to perceive the relations among actors involved in the rural-forest policy networks. The problem of an objective analysis of formal and informal power and information flow structure measurement and visualization in policy-making is tried to be solved. The policy network of "Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" is used as a case study as it includes a great variety of actors. An answer to the much-discussed problem of digital perception of politico-administrative power are in part the results about: (1) how complexity of policy making can be measured and what this practically means, (2) who controls the communication, (3) where the most important information resources are located, and (4) who is most trustworthy in this network. It is concluded that: "Important" information is not a source of trust, but rather inversely, through trust one can impose information as being important. Between actors of relatively high trust status, the most trusted one does not need to control information in order to strengthen its position. A less trusted actor may supplement the lack of power status with information control. The leading role that forestry sector may play even in cross-sectoral issues is pointed out in this case study.

[1]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[2]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Communicating Centrality in Policy Network Drawings , 1999, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[3]  Measuring bridges between sectors: Causative evaluation of cross-sectorality , 2006 .

[4]  Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro,et al.  Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview , 1992, AI Mag..

[5]  M. V. Valkenburg Network Analysis , 1964 .

[6]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Visone Software for Visual Social Network Analysis , 2001 .

[7]  S. Y. Nof,et al.  Design of Protocols for Task Administration in Collaborative Production Systems , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[8]  E. Papadopoulou,et al.  Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? , 2011 .

[9]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[10]  Nikolaos Hasanagas,et al.  Environmental Policy and Science Management: Using a Scientometric-specific GIS for E-learning Purposes , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[11]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[12]  Athanasios D. Styliadis,et al.  E-Learning & Environmental Policy: The case of a politico-administrative GIS , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[13]  S. Eisenstadt Power, Trust, and Meaning: Essays in Sociological Theory and Analysis , 1995 .

[14]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Mining Authoritativeness of Collaborative Innovation Partners , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[15]  Nikolaos Hasanagas Network Analysis Functionality in Environmental Policy: Combining Abstract Software Engineering with Field Empiricism , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[16]  Petar Cisar,et al.  EWMA Algorithm in Network Practice , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[17]  Nikolaos D. Hasanagas,et al.  Examining Agriculture from a Regional Perspective: Implications for the Common Agricultural Policy , 2011, HAICTA.

[18]  Nikolaos D. Hasanagas,et al.  A regional perspective of the Common Agricultural Policy , 2013 .