Binaural hearing after middle ear surgery. Masking-level difference for interaural time and amplitude cues.

Previous investigations have shown that binaural hearing is often abnormal in patients having conductive hearing losses, and even in patients who have had hearing thresholds corrected by middle ear surgery. The present study assessed further the masking-level difference (MLD) in patients who had previously undergone middle ear surgery. The stimuli were chosen such that the sensitivity to interaural time difference cues and to interaural amplitude difference cues could be assessed independently. Results indicated that the MLD is abnormal in more than a third of 15 patients, even after surgery has restored normal hearing at the frequency of the test. The MLD is more likely to be reduced for the cue of interaural time difference than for interaural amplitude difference. Subjects who had lesions of long duration, early onset, and large asymmetry were particularly likely to have reduced MLDs.

[1]  W. Yost,et al.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  K. Helfer,et al.  The effect of masker interaural phase on the detection of a monaural signal. , 1988, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Effect of Conductive Hearing Loss and Middle Ear Surgery on Binaural Hearing , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  P. Zurek Consequences of conductive auditory impairment for binaural hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  S Buus,et al.  Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J Jerger,et al.  Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[9]  M A Fernandes,et al.  Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  G. Thompson,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Early Recurrent Middle Ear Disease , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  M A Fernandes,et al.  Monaural and binaural auditory frequency resolution measured using bandlimited noise and notched-noise masking. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. S. Colburn,et al.  Sound localization with impaired hearing , 1979 .

[13]  M. Silverman,et al.  Plasticity of binaural interaction. II. Critical period and changes in midline response. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Webster,et al.  Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. , 1977, Archives of otolaryngology.

[15]  H S Colburn,et al.  Lateral position and interaural discrimination. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. Nuetzel,et al.  Difference thresholds for interaural intensity. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W O Olsen,et al.  Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  W A Yost,et al.  Discriminations of interaural phase differences. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of Interaural Phase and Level in Detection and Lateralization: 250 Hz , 1971 .

[21]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  N. Durlach,et al.  Interaural time and amplitude jnds for a 500-Hz tone. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D. Perrott,et al.  Lateralization and intensity discrimination. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Noise Localization after Unilateral Attenuation , 1966 .

[25]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[26]  R. Häusler,et al.  Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[27]  F L Wightman,et al.  Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[28]  A. Quaranta,et al.  Clinical value of the tonal masking level difference. , 1978, Audiology.

[29]  A R Antonelli,et al.  Masking level difference: another tool for the evaluation of peripheral and cortical defects. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[30]  G Lidén,et al.  Sound localization with phase audiometry. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[31]  E R Hafter,et al.  Difference thresholds for interaural delay. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  L. Jongkees,et al.  Directional hearing capacity in hearing disorders. , 1957, Acta oto-laryngologica.