Rapid Communication: The Apple of the mind's eye: Everyday attention, metamemory, and reconstructive memory for the Apple logo

People are regularly bombarded with logos in an attempt to improve brand recognition, and logos are often designed with the central purpose of memorability. The ubiquitous Apple logo is a simple design and is often referred to as one of the most recognizable logos in the world. The present study examined recall and recognition for this simple and pervasive logo and to what degree metamemory (confidence judgements) match memory performance. Participants showed surprisingly poor memory for the details of the logo as measured through recall (drawings) and forced-choice recognition. Only 1 participant out of 85 correctly recalled the Apple logo, and fewer than half of all participants correctly identified the logo. Importantly, participants indicated higher levels of confidence for both recall and recognition, and this overconfidence was reduced if participants made the judgements after, rather than before, drawing the logo. The general findings did not differ between Apple and PC users. The results provide novel support for theories of attentional saturation, inattentional amnesia, and reconstructive memory; additionally they show how an availability heuristic can lead to overconfidence in memory for logos.

[1]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Memory for everyday objects : Where are the digits on numerical keypads ? , 1999 .

[2]  J. Fawcett.  The Handbook of Attention , 2015 .

[3]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Fire drill: Inattentional blindness and amnesia for the location of fire extinguishers , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  R. Nickerson,et al.  Long-term memory for a common object , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The floor effect: Impoverished spatial memory for elevator buttons , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Henderson,et al.  Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .

[7]  F. Strack,et al.  An inferential approach to the knew-it-all-along phenomenon , 2003, Memory.

[8]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Saturation advertising and the repetition effect , 1980 .

[9]  J. Wolfe.  Inattentional Amnesia , 2000 .

[10]  G. V. Jones,et al.  Generalizing everyday memory: Signs and handedness , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[11]  R. Nickerson,et al.  SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR COMPLEX MEANINGFUL VISUAL CONFIGURATIONS: A DEMONSTRATION OF CAPACITY. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[12]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[14]  A. Castel,et al.  Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgments of learning , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  William R. Marmie,et al.  Memory for common objects: brief intentional study is sufficient to overcome poor recall of US coin features , 2004 .

[16]  J. Wolfe.  Visual memory: What do you know about what you saw? , 1998, Current Biology.

[17]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-detection Ability , 2000 .

[18]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Attention, Researchers! It Is Time to Take a Look at the Real World , 2003 .

[20]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  What skilled typists don’t know about the QWERTY keyboard , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.