Personal heating: effectiveness and energy use

Buildings use approximately 40% of primary energy with most energy expended on the provision of a comfortable indoor climate. An extended range of indoor temperatures can significantly reduce the energy load. However, lower temperature set points for heating can cause thermal discomfort. Giving building occupants the option to warm themselves (e.g. a local source at their desk or workstation) can mitigate this discomfort by the provision of a personalized conditioning system. A model is presented to assess the performance of personalized heating and its impact on the whole building energy load. Researchers, designers and facility managers can use this model to compare performance and analyse energy savings. The total energy use of personalized heating is estimated by scaling its settings to the actual level of discomfort resulting from a lowered heating set point. This model is used to assess seven different personalized heating systems. Assessments reveal that personalized heating brings a remarkable energy-saving potential, while maintaining or even improving individually perceived thermal comfort. Assessments are based on an assumed linear relation between the power and level of increased thermal sensation. Future research in personalized conditioning systems should be directed towards the development of the full characteristics and specific settings.

[1]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Effect of a heated and cooled office chair on thermal comfort , 2012, HVAC&R Research.

[2]  Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment , 2008 .

[3]  Chandra Sekhar,et al.  Ceiling mounted personalized ventilation system in hot and humid climate—An energy analysis , 2010 .

[4]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[5]  R. Kosonen,et al.  Assessment of productivity loss in air-conditioned buildings using PMV index , 2004 .

[6]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  Human Response to an Individually Controlled Microenvironment , 2007 .

[7]  A. Melikov,et al.  The influence of heated or cooled seats on the acceptable ambient temperature range , 2007, Ergonomics.

[8]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort— Part I: Uniform environmental conditions , 2006 .

[9]  Edward Arens,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality ( IEQ ) Title Are ' Class A ' temperature requirements realistic or desirable ? , 2009 .

[10]  A. Melikov,et al.  Design of an individually controlled system for an optimal thermal microenvironment , 2010 .

[11]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  Energy-saving strategies with personalized ventilation in cold climates , 2009 .

[12]  A. Melikov.  Personalized ventilation. , 2004, Indoor air.

[13]  Darren Robinson,et al.  On the unification of thermal perception and adaptive actions , 2010 .

[14]  A. Melikov,et al.  Effect of warm air supplied facially on occupants' comfort , 2010 .

[15]  Kwang Ho Lee,et al.  Energy savings from extended air temperature setpoints and reductions in room air mixing - eScholarship , 2005 .

[16]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Personalized conditioning and its impact on thermal comfort and energy performance - A review , 2014 .

[17]  Chandra Sekhar,et al.  Energy analysis of the personalized ventilation system in hot and humid climates , 2010 .

[18]  Kai Sirén,et al.  Design strategy for maximizing the energy-efficiency of a localized floor-heating system using a thermal manikin with human thermoregulatory control , 2012 .

[19]  E.C.M. van Oeffelen,et al.  Persoonlijke verwarming in kantoorgebouwen , 2010 .

[20]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Comfort, perceived air quality, and work performance in a low-power task–ambient conditioning system , 2008 .

[21]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia , 2011 .

[22]  G. Brager.  Benefits of Improving Occupant Comfort and Well-being in Buildings , 2013 .