PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF GAOFEN-3 POLARIMETRIC AND RADIOMETRIC ACCURACY BY CORNER REFLECTORS IN INNER MONGOLIA

Abstract. On August 10, 2016, China launched its first C-band full polarimetric radar satellite, named Gaofen-3 (GF-3), for urban and agriculture monitoring, landslide detection, ocean applications, etc. According to the design specification, GF-3 is expected to work at −35 dB crosstalk and 0.5 dB channel imbalance, with less than 10 degree error. The absolute radiometric bias is expected to be less than 1.5 dB in a single scene and 2.0 dB when operating for a long time. To complete the calibration and evaluation, the Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy Sciences (IECAS) built a test site at Inner Mongolia, and deployed active reflectors (ARs) and trihedral corner reflectors (CRs) to solve and evaluate the hardware distortion. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the product accuracy of GF-3 has not been comprehensively evaluated in any open publication. The remote sensing community urgently requires a detailed report about the product accuracy and stability, before any subsequent application. From June to August of 2017, IECAS begun its second round ground campaign and deployed 10 CRs to evaluate product distortions. In this paper, we exploit Inner Mongolia CRs to investigate polarimetric and radiometric accuracy of QPSI I Stripmap. Although some CRs found fall into AR side lobe, the rest CRs enable us to preliminarily evaluate the accuracy of some special imaging beams. In the experimental part, the image of July 6, 2017 was checked by 5 trihedral CRs and the integration estimation method demonstrated the crosstalk varying from −42.65 to −32.74 dB, and the channel imbalance varying from −0.21 to 0.47 with phase error from −2.4 to 0.2 degree. Comparing with the theoretical radar cross-section of 1.235 m trihedral CR, i.e. 35 dB, the radiometric error varies about 0.20 ± 0.29 dB in HH channel and 0.40 ± 0.20 dB in VV channel.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Estimation of 3-D Surface Displacement Based on InSAR and Deformation Modeling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Bruce Chapman,et al.  UAVSAR Polarimetric Calibration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  A Oy,et al.  Synthetic Aperture Radar Calibration Using Reference Reflectors , 1990 .

[4]  Pingxiang Li,et al.  Co-polarization channel imbalance determination by the use of bare soil , 2014 .

[5]  Zhang Qingjun,et al.  System Design and Key Technologies of the GF-3 Satellite , 2017 .

[6]  Shaun Quegan,et al.  A unified algorithm for phase and cross-talk calibration of polarimetric data-theory and observations , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Dan Wu,et al.  Adaptive Laplacian Eigenmap-Based Dimension Reduction for Ocean Target Discrimination , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[8]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  Orientation angle preserving a posteriori polarimetric SAR calibration , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Valery U. Zavorotny,et al.  Measurement of Ocean Wave Directional Spectra Using Airborne HF/VHF Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Theoretical Evaluation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  山田 寛喜,et al.  校正用平行平板ターゲットによる Polarimetric Calibration の検討 , 1997 .

[11]  Anthony Freeman,et al.  SAR calibration: an overview , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Lei Shi,et al.  Building Collapse Assessment in Urban Areas Using Texture Information From Postevent SAR Data , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Lei Shi,et al.  Building Collapse Assessment by the Use of Postearthquake Chinese VHR Airborne SAR , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[14]  J. Zyl,et al.  Calibration of polarimetric radar images using only image parameters and trihedral corner reflector responses , 1990 .