A manually denoised audio-visual movie watching fMRI dataset for the studyforrest project

The data presented here are related to the studyforrest project that uses the movie ‘Forrest Gump’ to map brain functions in a real-life context using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, neural-related fMRI signals are often small and confounded by various noise sources (i.e., artifacts) that makes searching for the signals induced by specific cognitive processes significantly challenging. To make neural-related signals stand out from the noise, the audio-visual movie watching fMRI dataset from the project was denoised by a combination of spatial independent component analysis and manual identification of signals or noise. Here, both the denoised data and the labeled decomposed components are shared to facilitate further study. Compared with the original data, the denoised data showed a substantial improvement in the temporal signal-to-noise ratio and provided a higher sensitivity in subsequent analyses such as in an inter-subject correlation analysis. Measurement(s)Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Functional MRITechnology Type(s)data transformationSample Characteristic - OrganismHomo sapiens Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10266554

[1]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film , 2008 .

[2]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Habib Benali,et al.  CORSICA: correction of structured noise in fMRI by automatic identification of ICA components. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Oliver Speck,et al.  A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie , 2014, Scientific Data.

[6]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The chronoarchitecture of the human brain—natural viewing conditions reveal a time-based anatomy of the brain , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  Tamara Vanderwal,et al.  Inscapes: A movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2015, NeuroImage.

[9]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Low-frequency fluctuations in the cardiac rate as a source of variance in the resting-state fMRI BOLD signal , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  FSL , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[14]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real‐life viewing conditions , 2009, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[15]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Lurito,et al.  Correlations in Low-Frequency BOLD Fluctuations Reflect Cortico-Cortical Connections , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  E. Maguire,et al.  Decoding human brain activity during real-world experiences , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Hand classification of fMRI ICA noise components , 2017, NeuroImage.

[21]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  Michael Hanke,et al.  A studyforrest extension, simultaneous fMRI and eye gaze recordings during prolonged natural stimulation , 2016, Scientific Data.

[23]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  R. Wiest,et al.  Time Course Based Artifact Identification for Independent Components of Resting-State fMRI , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  K. Pelphrey,et al.  Perspective: Brain scans need a rethink , 2012, Nature.

[28]  Zhishun Wang,et al.  Visual inspection of independent components: Defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  Christian F. Beckmann,et al.  Modelling with independent components , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[32]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Individual differences in functional connectivity during naturalistic viewing conditions , 2016, NeuroImage.